Gravel and AIPAC (his opinions on them)?

Recently some democrats and republicans went to speak at AIPAC.  I can understand wanting to be inexclusive being leaders in the House and Senate but I just don't trust this group.  If I'm remembering correctly either last year or late 2005 Condi Rice spilt state secrets to them.  I can't remember if they were that group but I remember her doing it to some Israeli lobbyist group and that's the most well known group and the most powerful and at the same time the Bushies were screaming about the NYTimes reporting on news that was really a few months old.  I guess my question is what does Mr. Gravel think of AIPAC and would he ever attend a meeting of their's?  I personally think they are the reasoning why the Iran provision was taken out of the recent Iraq bill.  I think it's sad it was taken out and even had to be put there in the first place because it's already a law of our country's in the Constitution.  Well thanks in advanced.

Comments

A foreign policy based upon injustice requires perpetual warfare

U.S.: No strings attached to new defense package for Israel
The new $30 billion American defense package for Israel is not conditioned on diplomatic progress or concessions to the Palestinians, a top U.S. aide said Thursday as representatives from both countries signed the memorandum of understanding in Jerusalem.
Tossing Fuel on a Fire
According to a new Associated Press report, the US is offering Israel a record $30-billion 10-year military aid package.

Let's ignore for a moment the AP story's irony-free comment that "Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns said the package was meant to back peace-seeking countries like Israel and moderate Arab states in the region to counter U.S. adversaries such as Iran." (Israel is a "peace-seeking" country?) We'll just focus on the amount of money that's being promised here.

Israel is a land of only 6 million people. That works out to about $5000 in arms aid per man, woman and child, and of course, since nearly a third of the people in Israel are Palestinian, and won't see a penny's (or bullet's) worth of that aid, it's really closer to $7500 per person. And remember, this is no basket case nation; this is one of the most technologically developed and wealthiest countries on earth we're talking about here.

Looked at another way, this aid to Israel represents a gift of $100 worth of money and weaponry from every man, woman and child in America to the people of Israel.

Please write to your senators and representative in the House and demand that they vote against this latest installment in the AIPAC enacted Israeli Entitlement Program.

Give the Palestinians a chance at a life free from Israeli brutality administered at no cost to the Israelis, the entire cost being borne by us Americans.

The AIPAC and the Top Down Media (TDM) would have us believe not only that brutality and injustice are the Palestinians' due but that brutality and injustice can be administered against them with no consequences for the Israeli and American peoples.

This is patent, dangerous, willful denial and must come to and end now.

We cannot wait for Mike's election before we take action to end the slaughter of the Palestinians and the expropriation of their lands at both our present and future expense.

A foreign policy based upon injustice requires perpetual warfare in its defense.

--

What matters is making the stand. Eleonai Israel

This is the kind of stuff

This is the kind of stuff that Mike Gravel will not be susceptible to.

No American President can stand up to Israel.

These words came from feisty Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chief of Naval Operations (1967-1970) and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1970-1974). Moorer was, perhaps, the last independent-minded American military leader.

Admiral Moorer knew what he was talking about. On June 8, 1967, Israel attacked the American intelligence ship, USS Liberty, killing 34 American sailors and wounding 173. The Israelis even strafed the life rafts, machine-gunning the American sailors leaving the stricken ship.

Apparently, the USS Liberty had picked up Israeli communications that revealed Israel's responsibility for the Six Day War. Even today, history books and the majority of Americans blame the conflict on the Arabs.

The United States Navy knew the truth, but the President of the United States took Israel's side against the American military and ordered the United States Navy to shut its mouth. President Lyndon Johnson said it was all just a mistake. Later in life, Admiral Moorer formed a commission and presented the unvarnished truth to Americans.

The power of the Israel Lobby over American foreign policy is considerable. In March 2006, two distinguished American scholars, John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, expressed concern in the London Review of Books that the power of the Israel Lobby was bending US foreign policy in directions that serve neither US nor Israeli interests. The two experts were hoping to start a debate that might rescue the US and Israel from unsuccessful policies of coercion that are intensifying Muslim hatred of Israel and America. The Israel lobby was opposed to any such reassessment, and attempted to close it off with epithets: "Jew-baiter," "anti-semitic," and even "anti-American." Today Israeli citizens who oppose Zionist plans for greater Israel are denounced as "anti-Semites."

--

What matters is making the stand. Eleonai Israel

Judaism & Israel

From The Philadelphia Jewish Voice (Found via Mike in the News)

Interview with Senator Mike Gravel

Judaism & Israel

PJV: Why did you not participate in the recent annual National Jewish Democratic Council’s Washington Policy Conference? All the other Democratic candidates did. [Biden, Clinton, Dodd, Edwards, Kucinich, and Richardson]

My understanding was that I was invited, and then they told me it was postponed. No, I would break a leg to attend any invitation. I was not invited by AIPAC. I was invited by a Jewish group in Maryland and I was delighted to go speak with them.

I have very strong positions on all of this. I was raised in Jewish community in Springfield, Massachusetts. Our house was located within five blocks of three synagogues, and I’ve always been very, very supportive of Israel. My record indicates that. And I have an identical record while I served, identical to Sen. Jake Javits (R-NY) and identical to Sen. Abe Ribicoff (D-CT). So, my record is there.

However, I am very much my own man, and I make no misrepresentations about that. I will not be controlled by any group or any pressure group in this country with respect to bringing peace to Israel. And I made a pledge to the group in Maryland, the Jewish group in Maryland, that bringing peace between Israel and the Palestinians is going to be the first priority of my foreign policy. And I will use whatever political capital I need to disburse to bring peace about. And I will be very tough about making sure that it is brought about.

Now, I exclude the war, because I think the war could be ended now if we had some leadership in the Congress, but if the war is not ended, I’ll end the war immediately, bringing the troops home in 120 days. And I will work to recognize Iran and Syria and have them help end the civil war.

But now, with respect to Israel, the approach that I would use would be to use the full force of the American government in a diplomatic effort, backed by the European Union, Russia, China – all the countries who have a stake in the stability of the Middle East – to meld them together to provide a cocoon of safety for the moderates in Israel and the moderates in the Palestinian community to come together to fashion a deal, to fashion an agreement that would be along the lines, which we all know what they are, the 1967 borders, tweaked to satisfy some vital interests of Israel and to satisfy some vital interests of the Palestinian community.

Now, with that cocoon of security, marginalizing the violence that will occur because the crazies on the margins will always try to destabilize an agreement with their violence. We can’t let that happen anymore. And so this cocoon of moderates would arrive at an agreement and that agreement would be put to the people in Israel for a plebiscite, and for the people of the Palestinian community for a plebiscite. This is not a deal made by the leaders; this is going to be a deal bought into by the people themselves. And as a result of that, we will commit, under our leadership, a global effort to raise the standard of living in the Palestinian community equal to that of Israel and free up Israel so it can stop spending so much of its wealth on its defense posture. And that way, even improve its own society, because there’s a lot more poverty in Israel than people own up to, a lot more, and its tragic.

I can only say this about the Israeli leadership, and it applies equally to the corruption that exist in the Palestinian leadership, and the Israeli leadership is not without corruption. But, I have no stomach for hawks who lead the United States of America, and I have even less so for those who lead the nation of Israel or the Palestinian community. So, I make a pledge, a solemn pledge, and I think I can do it, I know I can do it. I will bring peace between the Israelis and Palestinians and thereby diffuse the entire confrontation between the Islamic world and the West. That is worth doing. And I will not be deterred by any lobbying force from that goal.

30 billion more for Israel! and Murdoch grows richer/ Iraqi oil

absolute madness.  the corruption is pervasive.  Now with Murdoch taking over  The Wall Street Journal and Dow-Jones (no MySpace for me ever!!!) ...good buds with Silverstein, Lowy, Eisenberg, Netanyahu and the clan.  do your 9/11 research people. perhaps the protocols of the elders of zion are actually true...it sure seems to be the case. so many in our government who have and have had such power and control - not even real American citizens - half Israeli citizens! people should be outraged. and now we read that iraqi oil will be flowing to israeli refineries...is anyone surpirsed???

Come on Palestinian Americans, Arab Americans, speak out! anyone who believes in justice, speak out! Mike Gravel...speak out! demand reinvestigation of the worst crime on american soil...9/11!!!

I remember Mike being asked

I remember Mike being asked about AIPAC.  Does anyone have that clip?  What I remeber is that Mike grew up in a neighborhood with 3 synagogs and that he appreciates the compeling visions of the Jewish culture.  I think he said he was scheduled to address AIPAC, but they moved the dates and did not get a chance after all.  He did however address other Jewish groups and was received well. 

My question to Palestinian supporters here is this.  Is it possible for a people that do not proslotze, or force conversion at the point of the sword to survive in this world?  Is murder, mayhem and intolerance for any but your own an essential element of evolution for the human race?  Hamas can decide to end the war today by simply giving up the suicidal meme that Israel belongs to Islam.

Give'im hell - vote Gravel

Barak says peace deal a

Barak says peace deal a 'fantasy'
Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak has been quoted by an Israeli newspaper as saying that a peace deal with the Palestinians anytime soon is "fantasy".

According to Yedioth Ahronoth, Mr Barak said Israel would not withdraw its military checkpoints on the West Bank until it has developed defences against rocket attacks from Palestinian territory.

Mr Barak said this would take from three to five years.

"Israelis have healthy intuition," Mr Barak was quoted as saying by the newspaper. "They can't be fed more fantasies about an upcoming agreement with the Palestinians."

He was prime minister in the late 1990s and came close to reaching a peace agreement that would have given up much of the West Bank to the Palestinians.

The talks - which included a Camp David summit with the late Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and US President Bill Clinton - broke down...

Yet no one insists Israel recognize Palestine's right to exist

Yet no one insists Israel recognize Palestine's right to exist.

For an alternative view of the "meme's" in play see Stanley Heller :

 

Report from the Land of Apartheid

I disagree

They are educational and eye-opening. I think the citizens of this great nation have every right to know why the government can send $40,000,000,000 a year in aid to Israel and not  feed, shelter, or provide health care to our poor citizens in this country.

I also find it amazing that the Zionist's can perpetuate such atrocities against the people of Palestine and yet all that the lamestream media in the United States can report on is when a Palestinian fights back with the only means that are left to them, a suicide bomb.

Why are you not mentioning the IDF snipers who constantly take pot-shots at Palestinian children? Why are you not mentioning that Hamas won a democratic election fair and square, and by doing so resulted in the fact that the U.S. administration cut off aid to Palestine and are now trying to reinstill their puppet leader. Why are you not mentioning that almost all Palestinian's have to move through checkpoints and security gates manned by the IDF. Why are you not mentioning the new wall that is being built.

Doesn't sound like humanistic measures of good-will to me.

sosorrydubya

JFL, a peace settlement is not welcomed by everyone

Dear JFL et al,  It’s clear JFL has just cut and pasted every response he/she has posted.  Perhaps the first, “Against Israeli Apartheid,” he/she took from this site:  http://www.countercurrents.org/pa-dixon220806.htm.   All I could find here were articles demonizing Israel and the U.S.  No articles asking the Palestinian people to take hold of their futures.  Just the same demeaning rhetoric that treats the Palestinian people like children who can’t take any responsibility for their actions.  Hamas (sarcastically) didn’t want to throw Fatah members off buildings and execute them in the street, it’s not their fault, it’s Israel and the U.S., they did this.  They wouldn’t recognize Hamas as a legitimate political entity; it’s all their fault.  Hamas, a well known terrorist group (one that specifically target civilians), can certainly change its ways, but it’s now clear that Hamas has done nothing of the sort.  The US and Israel can recognize Hamas as a possible future partner, but to provide them support now, when they cannot even accept the existence of Israel (“not even one inch”), and when they kill both Israeli and Palestinian civilians, is utterly absurd.  The next response “Mideast Experts Skeptical About Bush PA Proposal” might have been sliced from this article.http://ipsnews.net/text/news.asp?idnews=38559 JFL left out these vital paragraphs from the same article:­[Describing Washington’s current strategy] “ It calls for providing full support to Abbas on the occupied West Bank while isolating his main rivals, former Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and his Hamas party, which took over the Gaza Strip last month after a series of gun battles with security forces loyal to Abbas' Fatah.   Bush said Washington would provide Abbas and his new government, headed by Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, with nearly 200 million dollars in mainly economic assistance, including humanitarian aid for Gaza, as well as an additional 80 million dollars in "non-lethal" aid for his security forces.   He also announced that Washington will convene "an international meeting" chaired by Rice later this fall to promote both internal Palestinian reform and the bilateral peace process that could offer Palestinians a "political horizon" for the achievement of a "viable and contiguous" state of their own.   "So I will call together an international meeting this fall of representatives from nations that support a two-state solution, reject violence, recognise Israel's right to exist, and commit to all previous agreements between (Israelis and Palestinians)," Bush said.   "The conflict in Gaza and the West Bank today is a struggle between extremists and moderates," he said, insisting that Hamas' recent takeover of Gaza "demonstrated beyond all doubt that it is (more) devoted to extremism and murder than to serving the Palestinian people."   He added that Palestinians now face a "moment of choice" between "the vision of Hamas ...(of) chaos, and suffering, and the endless perpetuation of grievance," and the "vision of President Abbas and Prime Minister Fayyad …of a peaceful state called Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people".   Bush also called, as he did in 2002 when he first endorsed a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, for Tel Aviv to halt its expansion of Jewish settlements and to remove unauthorised settlement outposts on the West Bank.   "At the same time, Israelis should find other practical ways to reduce their footprint without reducing their security -- so they can help President Abbas improve economic and humanitarian conditions," he said. ……….Ziad Azali, president of the American Task Force on Palestine, insisted that Bush's re-iteration of his support for a two-state solution was both "positive and timely", particularly after last month's events in Gaza.   "The team of Abu Mazen (Abbas) and Fayyad is one that can't be rejected by Israel as a partner," he said. "And we're seeing from Israel that this team is being taken seriously.   Indeed, David Welch, Rice's top Middle East adviser, insisted to reporters after the speech that the Abbas and Fayyad has constituted "the best Palestinian government since the formation of the Palestine Authority in 1994."  ” Finally, you also quote Mandela in “A Letter from Nelson Mandela to Thomas Friedman” “In the last few years, and especially during the reign of the Labour Party, Israel showed that it was not even willing to return what it occupied in 1967; that settlements remain, Jerusalem would be under exclusive Israeli sovereignty, and Palestinians would not have an independent state, but would be under Israeli economic domination with Israeli control of borders, land, air, water and sea.” You may want to find a more updated diatribe since “in the last few years” Israel has removed every single settlement from Gaza, and Kadima, a more moderate political party has taken control. The labour party did rule, and was most recently successful during the second intifada, when Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades waged a high-intensity campaign of guerrilla warfare and suicide bombings against Israel.  A noteworthy development during this intifada, is the use of suicide bombs carried by children. Unlike most suicide bombings, the use of these not only earned condemnation from the United States and from human rights groups such as Amnesty International, but also from many Palestinians and much of the Middle East press. The youngest Palestinian suicide bomber was 16-year-old Issa Bdeir, a high school student from the village of Al Doha, who shocked his friends and family when he blew himself up in a park in Rishon LeZion, killing a teenage boy and an elderly man. The youngest attempted suicide bombing was by a 14 year old captured by soldiers at the Huwwara checkpoint before managing to do any harm.  Wait, wasn’t this thread about Gravel and AIPAC?

All that is happening now is theater

A Warning to Tony Blair
All that is happening now is theater. Olmert pretends that he really wants to "save Abu Mazen," while doing the opposite.

At Bush's request, he allowed the transfer of a thousand rifles, with a lot of fanfare, from Jordan to Abbas, so he can fight Hamas – understanding full well that to an ordinary Palestinian this will look like collaboration with the occupier against the resistance.

He enlarges the settlements, keeps the "illegal outposts," and closes his eyes while the army is helping the settlers to put up more outposts.

Let's get some facts

Let's get some facts straight concerning the state of Israel.

1) Israel: The UNDemocratic State.

    As stated before in this forum, Arabs make up 20% of the population of Israel, yet still are treated as second class citizens. Systematically denied fundamental civil rights, Palestinian Israeli's have struggled for over sixty years to overcome the gross realities of institutional and social discrimination, police brutality, and neglect within a country they have citizenship to. To further affirm the tyranny of the Israeli regime and your obvious lack of facts, let me make clear that the Israeli Consitution describes the state of Israel as a JEWISH NATION.  Although this fact may seem obvious, lets conduct a bit of simple analysis so you can better understand the  fundamental misconception you and most Americans have concerning this country. 

 Though Democractic governments come in a number of forms, it is understood in America and in most of world that for equal citizenship to be a possiblity the law must be a secular entity. Essentially, the government is an institution that does not discriminate or prefer one religious group over another. Such is not the case in the state of Israel. Israel is a country of Jews and for Jews. The word "Palestinian" or even "Arab" is not even mentioned in the document, in context to them actually exsiting in the country-completely discrediting 20% of the population itself. Although Palestinians are not formally segregated within Israel, discrimination is a simple fact of every day life. Palestinian children attend schools and live in towns that face a severe lack of funding and maintenance due to the reality of institutional prejudice that make it impossible for an Arab Israeli to get a building permit or even a job within Israel.

The Palestinian people are not immigrants in the Holy Land. They have roots, family, memories in this land that have been wrongly taken from them. As citizens of this new Zionist nation, they have been forced to live as strangers in their own land. Forced to assimilate into a country that, based on the documentation on their passport, is their own. Israel cannot deny the Palestinians their own identity as a people, they cannot deny their existence, their history and their place on that land. Intimidation tactics will not quell this struggle within Israel, they will not silence the minority.

2) Israel: The Terrorist State

The definition of "terrorism" has taken on many different definitions, and throughout history has assumed a number of forms: most commonly- revolutionary, subrevolutionary, and established terrorism.

It is established terrorism, otherwise knows as state terrorism, that is of particular importance when addressing the role of the Israeli occupation in both the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the thousands of Palestinian prisoners within Israel, and the actions of the IDF and Jewish settlers against unarmed civilians within the illegal apartheid wall. 

Far to reminicent of the infamous Berlin wall in Cold War Germany and strikingly similar to the racist apartheid that the United States so vehemently condmened in South Africa, the current apartheid wall and illegal occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip is the most obvious example of Israel's role as a terrorist state. Extending far beyond its intended 1967 borders, Israel currently holds an illegal occupation of Palestinian land , lawfully ordained to the Palestinian people by the UN and international community through the 1967 Oslo Peace Accords.

The fight for this land began the 1st Intifada, or uprising. A struggle of the Palestinian people in the 1980's to gain back the land that was stolen from them by the Israeli government. In the midst of this warfare, traditional IDF tactcs of ethnic cleasing were (and still are) systematically used as a means by which to eliminate the Palestinian population. Massacres such as Sabra and Shatila in 1982 were a commonplace in everyday Palestinian life.  Within the occupied terrorities, sewage systems, clean running water, housing, paved roads, electricity, jobs, simply did not exist. IDF forces destroy olive groves daily, the sole source of Palestinian income. Entire housing communities, of the few that do exist, are bulldozed daily-waterways intended to feed into Palestinian communities are redirected towards Jewish settlements that are built on documented Palestinian land. Attacks by Jewish settlers are common, heinous curfews, military inspection, beatings, killings, checkpoints, are simply part of the humiliating life that the Paletinians face on their own land. Palestinians living in the occupied territories are given different colored license plates so Israeli forces know to individually stop them and allow for Jews to pass through freely. Getting to hospitals, schools, jobs has now become nearly impossible. The Israeli army has settled itself and currently controls land that does not even belong to them. they instill checkpoints on Palestinian roads and shoot Palestinian children in Palestinian towns with American made guns and weapontry. They have divided a people with the intention of exterminating them or when they can take no more, perhaps flee. This military or state terrorism if you will, is not a fact simply of the past-but is a harsh reality of the present as well. And in order to address Palestinian terrorism a deeper look at Israeli terrorism must be made and better understood.

The struggle against Israeli terror and occupation picked up again in 2000, the year of the 2nd Intifada, marked by a steep rise in the suicide bombings throughout Israel. These suicide bombings are by no means justified- for no death of an unarmed civilian can be justified by any means. However, what we must understand, as objective onlookers in the situation, is the reason why a young Palestinian boy or girl can willingly use their body as a weapon.

Although it is difficult to relate to a life under occupation, it can be for certain the misery, pain, and humiliation Palestinian children are born into would have a profound psychological effect  on any person, no matter how moral of a person you believe youself to be. Many who choose the path of destruction in suicide bombings are those who have lost all hope for their own future, have seen indescribable suffering, and are fully aware that the international community has no intention of helping them-they are virtually left nothing with which they can call their own-not even the right to exist. It is through this vulnerability that an individual views their own body as their only weapon against those who have taken thier land, their identity, and their freedom. And it is with that body that an individual looks to inflict pain on the enemy. In the psyche of any individual in a war zone, the world exists in black and white. There is you and there is the enemy. There is no distinction between soldier and civilian, man, woman, or child. There are simply those who live on the other side of the wall, those who live on the land of their ancestors, those who told the world that "The Palestinian people do not exist" (Golda Meir).

Front page headlines of suicide bombings run across every magazine and newspaper in America, explaining the fears of every Israeli citizen who cannot even go out to night clubs or bars or restaurants whenever they want because of fears of an attack. These fears are justified and legitimate, but this story is not complete. For who knew that Palestinians cannot step outside their homes without a fear of being shot by snipers, that women cannot reach hospitals in time to give birth, that the elderly cannot receive medical treatment, that people cannot get to their jobs, that children cannot go to school? Who knew that Israel currently hold 10,000 Palestinian prisoners in jails and dentention centers, a large percentage of which are women and children? Who knew of the Palestinian story?

Israel is not the only victim in this conflict. In fact, this conflict is a simple relationship between the occupied and the occupier. The Palestinian struggle for a recognized identity is not a unique one when looking at history. This fight for an identity as well as human and civil rights is no different than Colonists who fought in the Revolutionary War, Indians who fough against British colonialism, or South Africans who fought against aparthied. The Palestinian story is the story of any people who have struggled for the right to exist, the right to an identity, and the right to freedom.

I see that I have written a lot already. I was planning on writing a third point to touch on the most current situation concerning the apartheid wall. But I'm tired, and do not wish to explain the situation any further unless someone truly wants me to.

I close this with the hope that each of you keep in mind these facts. That the United States supports an undemocratic, apartheid, terrorist nation with 40 billion dollars of American tax money each year. Tax money that could be going towards veteran care, our education system, our welfare programs, Hurricane Katrine victims. We have put more money into providing for Israeli citizens with weapontry that supports an illegal occupation than our own citizens here in this country. And that is the most shameful truth that faces are country thus far, and a truth that Washington has chosen to cover up and ignore.

so as we fight this global War on Terror, perhaps we should look a bit closer at who we are fighting. For the Israeli regime is on no higher moral ground than Saddam Hossein, Osama Bin laden, or any other war lord or terrorist in the world. Hamas, a "terrorist" organization, was elected as the ruling government because they are the only organization willing to give funds and protection back to the Palestinian people. They are the only organization willing to continue the fight for freedom. These  so called "radicals" are only a reflection of the dire situation the Palestinians face. They are their only hope... It is so called "secular' organizations such as Fatah and the former PLO that put money into the hands of corrupt politicians such as Yasser Arafat and ignored the strife of their own people. These were all corrupt organizations who, keep in mind, were supported and encouraged by the United States. Coincidence? I think not.

The Question of Palestine is one that can be easily answered. Not by elaborate "Roadmaps to Peace" or ceasefires, but the simple recognition of a people and their Right to Return to their own land. It is a fact that Israel must face, or it will indeed perish under the evident economic strains that plague the country, and the deep social divides in Jewish society concerning the conflict.

 

I hope this has clarified the conflict. Many people do not seem to really understand the facts of the situation at all. egoldst2-this is for you.

 

Yes, and Mike Gravel supports Israel within its 1967 borders

Yes, it was about Mike and the AIPAC and Mike Gravel supports Israel within its 1967 borders. The AIPAC does not. The most recent question is about the real proposal behind the headlines of Bush's "West Bank First" proposal. We have to wait and see.

I am afraid that it will seek to institutionalize the Israeli "settlements", the ones Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barack built with US money during the years after George Bush stated that they ought not to do so, as well as ALL the others.

This is the AIPAC position. This is not Mike Gravel's position.

Time will tell.

I "perhaps" might have taken the link to Black Agenda Report from the source you site, but of course I did not. I recommend Black Agenda Report to everyone here.

I also recommend that everyone here follow up the links to Desmond Tutu's and Nelson Mandela's reflections on Apartheid in South Africa and Israel through the links I furnished below.

Educating oneself on the US/Israeli role in the Middle East requires effort. The MSM in the United States certainly and in Europe to a great extent parrots the Israeli line. The Palestinians have been oppressed for far too long. It is time for the a free and sovereign Palestine in ALL of the illegally occupied West Bank and Gaza strip and for a connection free from Israeli interference between them.

Let us see if that is what the Bush plan calls for. That is what Mike Gravel calls for.

Israel's population is 20% Arab

SouthernBelle82

To reply to an earlier post about Israel's population:

20% of Israel's population,(not those living in the W. Bank or Gaza, but those living within the State of Israel) are ARAB, not Jewish.  1/5 of Israel's population are Arab citizens, with the right to vote and hold elective office in the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament).  In fact, Arab's have held seats in every Knesset since Israel's Independce in 1948.  Arab is also an official language in Israel, along with Hebrew.

To other posters: 

The armed forces of Israel allow service without any distinction based on sexual orientation. Since 1993, homosexuals have been allowed to openly serve in the military, including special units.

Although official gay marriage has not been sanctioned, a common marraige law now grants marriage rights to a gay/lesbian spouse, and same-sex marriages performed outside Israel are recognized.

 I would prefer not to debate history, but even revisionist historians such as Benny Morris, justify Israel's actions in the 1948 War, when it was attacked by surrounding Arab states.

 It is also important to note that Israel has withdrawn from Lebanon and recently withdrew from the Gaza Strip.  There are no Israeli soldiers in Gaza, but Gaza continues to fire rockets into Southern Israeli towns. 

 Finally, a two-state solution is the only answer, and Israel will eventually withdraw from the West Bank and dismantle a number of smaller settlements.  Immense compensation will be given to Palestinians who claim the right of return to Israel and Jerusalem will be carefully divided.  Israel is just waiting for a peace partner.  It tried to withdraw unilaterally in 2005 (from Gaza), but rockets are continually launched from the Strip.

 And as for American aid to Israel.  It is around 3 Billion a year.  That's # 1.  Would you like to know #2.  It's Egypt, at around 2 Billion.  Check Egypt's human rights record.  It's frightening.  My friend just returned from Egypt after 6 months and he told me some scary stories about the Egyptian Police and Mubarak's policies. 

Gravel is the Man! He's the only candidate that stands for REAL change.  Tell your friends, cause he should be able to secure the youth vote!

Peace

Oh I know all that

I've done my homework as best as I can on Israel and the situation there.  Of course not being there actually I can only go by the research I've done and  I think Gravel has a great idea with Israel which is to get the moderates together and let them talk and make a decision about the situation.  I don't think anyone can say what a country should do with it's borders and it's only up to them in my opinion.  That's why I like getting the moderates together and talking it out etc (think of a Constitutional Convention like our founding fathers had).

before we uncork the champagne

"20% of Israel's population,(not those living in the W. Bank or Gaza, but those living within the State of Israel) are ARAB, not Jewish. 1/5 of Israel's population are Arab citizens, with the right to vote and hold elective office in the Knesset (the Israeli Parliament)."

Israeli Apartheid
Imagine, if you will, a modern apartheid state with first, second and eleventh class citizens, all required to carry identification specifying their ethnic origin. First class citizens are obliged to serve in the armed forces, kept on ready reserve status until in their forties, and accorded an impressive array of housing, medical, social security, educational and related benefits denied all others.

Second class citizens are exempted from military service and from a number of the benefits accorded citizens of the first class. They are issued identity documents and license plates that allow them to be profiled by police at a distance. Second class citizens may not own land in much of the country and marriages between them and first class citizens are not recognized by the state. Second class citizens are sometimes arrested without trial and police torture, while frowned upon and occasionally apologized for, commonly occurs.

Citizens of the eleventh class, really not citizens at all, have no rights citizens of the first class or their government are bound to respect. Their residence is forbidden in nearly nine-tenths of the country, all of which they used to own. The areas left to them are cut up into smaller and smaller portions weekly, by high walls, free fire zones and hundreds of checkpoints manned by the army of the first class citizens, so that none can travel a dozen miles in any direction to work, school, shopping, a job, a farm, a business or a hospital without several long waits, humiliating searches and often arbitrary denials of the right to pass or to return. Posh residential settlements for the first class citizens with protecting gun towers and military bases are built with government funds and foreign aid on what used to be the villages and farms and pastures of the eleventh class citizens. The settlers are allotted generous additional housing and other subsidies, allowed to carry weapons and use deadly force with impunity against the former inhabitants, and are connected with the rest of first class territory by a network of of first-class citizen only roads.

Citizens of the eleventh class are routinely arrested, tortured, and held indefinitely without trial. Political activism among them is equated to “terrorism” and the state discourages such activity by means including but not limited to the kidnapping of suspects and relatives of suspects, demolition of their family homes, and extralegal assassination, sometimes at the hands of a death squad, or at others times by lobbing missiles or five hundred pound bombs into sleeping apartment blocks or noonday traffic. Passports are not issued to these citizens, and those who take advantage of scarce opportunities to study or work abroad are denied re-entry.
"It is also important to note that Israel has withdrawn from Lebanon and recently withdrew from the Gaza Strip. There are no Israeli soldiers in Gaza, but Gaza continues to fire rockets into Southern Israeli towns. "

There may be no Israeli troops now in Lebanon but during their retreat the Israel Air Force sowed southern Lebanon with literally millions of cluster bomblets, giving the people who live their two choices : relinquish the land to Israel or continue to farm it at the risk of life and limb.

The Israelis may have "withdrawn" from Gaza, but they blew up the water supply, built with $50,000,000 American dollars, when they left. They have sealed the Gaza, making it a Concentration Camp for its Palestinian prisoners. They routinely send F-16s, Apache helicopters, pilotless drones, and tanks to attack and murder Palestinians in their homes in Gaza.

"Finally, a two-state solution is the only answer, and Israel will eventually withdraw from the West Bank and dismantle a number of smaller settlements. Immense compensation will be given to Palestinians who claim the right of return to Israel and Jerusalem will be carefully divided. Israel is just waiting for a peace partner."

Mideast Experts Skeptical About Bush PA Proposal
Daniel Levy, a former Israeli peace negotiator currently based at the Century Foundation and the New America Foundation here, was even more dismissive of the speech, which, he said, "may well drive Palestinian politics towards a period of even greater chaos that could create a space for al-Qaeda look-alikes to gain a foothold [in the Palestinian territories]."

Bush's approach, he said, appeared to be based on "deepening" the conflict between Fatah and Hamas rather than trying to bring them together.

"The two-state solution that the president claims to support will need to deliver and have legitimacy on both sides in order to have a chance of being sustainable. That cannot be based on an irreconcilable Palestinian political division," Levy noted, pointing to recent press leaks by U.S. intelligence officials who oppose the West Bank First strategy on the grounds that Hamas is too strong and has too much popular support to be effectively isolated or marginalized.
The specifics of the Bush "plan" are not yet public, but one can be sure that the "immense compensation" to be given the Palestinians will be paid by Americans, not Israelis.

Palestine was a democracy after the election of Hamas. That was something the US and Israelis could not stomach. Dealing with Israeli terrorists (Menachem Begin) and Israeli War Criminals (Ariel Sharon) is fine. But dealing with Hamas is "out of the question".

Don't get me wrong, egoldst2, a peace settlement brought about by Bush or the devil himself is welcomed by everyone. But let's see the actual proposal before we uncork the champagne.

Class is Where You Find IT

There might be classes in just aabout everything.

It helps to be factual about class.

For example:  there are classes of  states.

At the top of the heap are the  " soverign aand independent states."

Turkey comes to mind.

States like Israel are  **not** soverign and independent.  I call them

"autonomous."  They have self-rule , but their existence is maintained by some other state,

or states.  Sometimes those states serve as barriers between powerhouse states.

Maybe Finland is one of those.

By the way :  The states of Texas and California are so hostile toward each other,

there are **two** buffer , or barrier, states between them :  New Mexico , and Arizona.

There are  " puppet" states.

There are " banana republics" run by corporations.  Actually ,  the UK  is

the ultimate  banana republic.  It is run by the  "crown corporation."

Many of the United States are banana republics.

Maybe the best way to get into this topic is to get a " good" dictionary ,

and read the synonyms for  " alliance." 

Actually , if I were  George Bush , I think I would take one of those  Saudi

princesses as the second wife.  On second thought , I guess if I asked him , he would.

He does everything anyone else asks him , if he  ***can*** do it.  Why would

he make an exception in my case ?  When push comes to shove :  it's going to

take more than both the Saudi " king"  , and  Elizabeth II both being  "royalty"

to protect U S interests in the middle east.    ?How do the Dutch manage it ?

R  o   W    t  h  E  G  r  a  V   e     L   !

 tannhauser PACOM  ,  tanaiste

Bruce Dixon is no Mandela

Mandela knows aparthied and Israel does not have a policy of aparthied. 

New York Times October 20, 1999
By WILLIAM A. ORME Jr.
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/mideast/102099israel-mandela.html

JERUSALEM -- ...And Mandela made it clear that he understands Israel's need "for Arab recognition of its existence within secure boundaries." Without such recognition a regional armistice would be "foolhardy," he said. ..."I understand completely well why Israel occupies these lands. There was a war. But if there is going to be peace, there must be complete withdrawal from all of these areas."

Give'im hell - vote Gravel

Time for all of America to see

You won't see this on American MSM or be able to listen to it from any of our eleted officials.

Read up, learn the facts.

http://www.nowarforisrael.com/

I wonder how many of those faces helped in the writing of the PNAC.

The Project for the New American Century.

Click here for other articles on this topic

The People versus the Powerful is the oldest story in human history. At no
point in history have the Powerful wielded so much control. At no point in
history has the active and informed involvement of the People, all of them,
been more absolutely required.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1665.htm

Yes, it is real, the link from the government's own site.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

sosorrydubya

Not all Neocons are Jews and not all Jews are Neocons

Not all Neocons are Jews and not all Jews are Neocons.

Yes it is the case that the AIPAC is a power behind the Neocons and a prime mover behind the wars in the Middle East, but Big Oil and Big War are right up there as well, and there are millions of Jews who are as appalled by the AIPAC as any of us are.

Please don't confuse the issues.

I never said they were

But, you can bet your bottom dollar that they are in bed together!

 

sosorrydubya

This is confusing and dangerous, in my opinion.

The banner article from your first link:

Meet just a few of your Jewish Supremacist Warmongers
From left to right: William Kristol, Richard Perle, Ari Fleischer, Israeli Prime Minister and Mass-Murderer Ariel Sharon, Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams, Douglas Feith

ISRAEL WAS BEHIND FAKE EVIDENCE
It is now official: Israeli spies fed fake evidence to US government through
Jewish US Government officials!

READ NOW!


The AIPAC and its kindred groups acting in support of the far-right wing in Israel are a subset of the Israeli and American Jewish populations, which are in turn a subset of the world's Jews.

References to "the Jews", like references to "the Arabs" or to any other group as a monolith can only play on the human proclivity to identify with "in groups" and to victimize "out groups".

These sensational "headlines" are the work of the nowarforisrael site. The links themselves point to articles in the American Conservative and The Guardian that make no such wild linkages themselves.

This is confusing and dangerous, in my opinion.

Archbishop Desmond Tut against Israeli Apartheid

Against Israeli Apartheid
Divestment from apartheid South Africa was fought by ordinary people at the grassroots. Faith-based leaders informed their followers, union members pressured their companies' stockholders and consumers questioned their store owners. Students played an especially important role by compelling universities to change their portfolios. Eventually, institutions pulled the financial plug, and the South African government thought twice about its policies.

Similar moral and financial pressures on Israel are being mustered one person at a time. Students on more than 40 US campuses are demanding a review of university investments in Israeli companies as well as in firms doing major business in Israel. From Berkeley to Ann Arbor, city councils have debated municipal divestment measures.

These tactics are not the only parallels to the struggle against apartheid. Yesterday's South African township dwellers can tell you about today's life in the Occupied Territories. To travel only blocks in his own homeland, a grandfather waits on the whim of a teenage soldier. More than an emergency is needed to get to a hospital; less than a crime earns a trip to jail. The lucky ones have a permit to leave their squalor to work in Israel's cities, but their luck runs out when security closes all checkpoints, paralyzing an entire people. The indignities, dependence and anger are all too familiar.

Many South Africans are beginning to recognize the parallels to what we went through. Ronnie Kasrils and Max Ozinsky, two Jewish heroes of the anti-apartheid struggle, recently published a letter titled "Not in My Name." Signed by several hundred other prominent Jewish South Africans, the letter drew an explicit analogy between apartheid and current Israeli policies. Mark Mathabane and Nelson Mandela have also pointed out the relevance of the South African experience.

Nelson Mandela wrote to Thomas Friedman in 2003

A Letter from Nelson Mandela to Thomas Friedman
Today the world, black and white, recognise that apartheid has no future. In South Africa it has been ended by our own decisive mass action in order to build peace and security. That mass campaign of defiance and other actions could only culminate in the establishment of democracy.

Perhaps it is strange for you to observe the situation in Palestine or more specifically, the structure of political and cultural relationships between Palestinians and Israelis, as an apartheid system. This is because you incorrectly think that the problem of Palestine began in 1967. This was demonstrated in your recent column "Bush's First Memo" in the New York Times on March 27, 2001.

You seem to be surprised to hear that there are still problems of 1948 to be solved, the most important component of which is the right to return of Palestinian refugees.

The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not just an issue of military occupation and Israel is not a country that was established "normally" and happened to occupy another country in 1967. Palestinians are not struggling for a "state" but for freedom, liberation and equality, just like we were struggling for freedom in South Africa.

In the last few years, and especially during the reign of the Labour Party, Israel showed that it was not even willing to return what it occupied in 1967; that settlements remain, Jerusalem would be under exclusive Israeli sovereignty, and Palestinians would not have an independent state, but would be under Israeli economic domination with Israeli control of borders, land, air, water and sea.

Israel was not thinking of a "state" but of "separation". The value of separation is measured in terms of the ability of Israel to keep the Jewish state Jewish, and not to have a Palestinian minority that could have the opportunity to become a majority at some time in the future. If this takes place, it would force Israel to either become a secular democratic or bi-national state, or to turn into a state of apartheid not only de facto, but also de jure.

So, clearly you confirm that

So, clearly you confirm that Israel is not an apatheid state, as Palestinians do not and will not become a majority anywhere but the State of Palestine, and they will live in peace and abundance in the State of Palestine following the vision of Mike Gravel and other 2-state believers. 

There is as much expectation that Palestinians will be a majority in Israel as they expect to be a majority in any other country.  Arab Israelis dont live in refugee camps like they do in other Arab countries. Now that is a cause you should be concerned about.

Give'im hell - vote Gravel

You brought up Nelson Mandela, frb

Nelson Mandela
Apartheid is a crime against humanity. Israel has deprived millions of Palestinians of their liberty and property. It has perpetuated a system of gross racial discrimination and inequality. It has systematically incarcerated and tortured thousands of Palestinians, contrary to the rules of international law. It has, in particular, waged a war against a civilian population, in particular children.

The responses made by South Africa to human rights abuses emanating from the removal policies and apartheid policies respectively, shed light on what Israeli society must necessarily go through before one can speak of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East and an end to its apartheid policies.

Thomas, I'm not abandoning Mideast diplomacy. But I'm not going to indulge you the way your supporters do. If you want peace and democracy, I will support you. If you want formal apartheid, we will not support you. If you want to support racial discrimination and ethnic cleansing, we will oppose you. When you figure out what you're about, give me a call.

This is a very positive

This is a very positive step. 

 http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_Arab_League_Delegation_to_Visit_Israel_06938.html

Give'im hell - vote Gravel

news source

I would like to think positively about this. we'll see. not so sure i trust this particular news source...

I hope you're right freerovingbovine

I hope you're right freerovingbovine, but I am very skeptical.

The civil war in Palestine, pitting the most abused and exploited people on earth against each other, was the work of Elliot Abrams and the Neocons in Washington. He, and they, are doing the same in Lebanon and Iraq, funding al Qaeda again, in both countries.

Egypt and Jordan are both US client states and their authoritarian Sunni regimes have apparently been scared by the prospect of any kind of democracy breaking out in the Middle East. Hamas is the democratically elected government in Palestine of course, no matter what the Neocons and their dupes say.

Time will tell, I hope that you are right, frb.

It's about time that Israel evacuated their illegal settlements on the West Bank and returned the land they've occupied there for forty years to the Palestinians.

Somehow, I don't think that's what the Neocons have in mind.

jfl and Kate,The article

jfl and Kate,

The article (and other news sources carried it as well) says the dispute is over where the Palestinian refugees will live.  I believe they should live, and florish, in the country of Palestine.  Although it would be good if they could immigrate to Israel, we first need to cure the infection.  You say WHAT Infection!

It appears that Islamists have been infected by a deadly virus that has spread through the Arab world like small-pox spread through our native population.  It must run it's course.  Our troops in Iraq is the wrong medicine.  I trust Mike understand this implicitly.

Please watch THIS video. 

http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/116 

Give'im hell - vote Gravel

The Lancet Fluke and the AIPAC

Thanks, freerovingbovine, for bringing Dan Dennett to our attention.

His analogy of the Lancet Fluke's use of the ant, and its subsequent destruction of its ant host in pursuit of the fluke's own purposes is very germane to this discussion, for it describes also the AIPAC's use of its American host, of its use of American funds and now its use of American lives in pursuit of the AIPAC's own perceived benefit.

And too, the AIPAC is destroying its host, the United States of America, just as surely as the Lancet Fluke destroys its ant hosts to gain access to the brains of the freerovingbovines, the real targets of its evolution.

here, here

I agree

If I may speak for the

If I may speak for the freerovingbovines of the world, I'd say we are in no fear of becoming extinct.  "We hold are large heads high; We run with the Buffalo or Die ... ".  Can't say that much for Hamas, who raise thier kindegarden suicide bombers to exterminate infidels.

Look, I tried to shed some light on this for you but maybe some meme can't let you go there. That's too bad.

Give'im hell - vote Gravel

What you will never see on CNN or FOX

Occupation 101 in 5 parts.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPMXdc0JNS4

in the news - Israel/Palestine

The Israel Lobby: APIAC

I have not watched this yet. The documentary is posted on YouTube in 5 parts. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6SQ02gqqao

" The Dutch documentary program "Tegenlicht" about the Israel lobby in the USA and it's influence on US Foreign Policy.

This new documentary (April 2007) was created as a result of the controversy created by Mearsheimer and Walt's "The Israel Lobby" article. Featuring interviews with Mearsheimer, geostrategist Lawrence Wikerson, Richard Perle, historian and critic Tony Judt, John Hagee, former Congressman Earl Hilliard, Kenneth Roth of Human Rights Watch, Michael Massing and Daniel Levy.

UN resolutions against the Israelian policy of suppression and occupation are without exception veto'd by the USA. Israel gets the highest amount of economic and military support worldwide (annually 3 billion+ ) in spite of their wealth. And now, the powerful lobby is even threatening US national security by pushing to war on Iran and Syria - without any solutions for Iraq and Afganistan.

'Tegenlicht' ('Counterlight') is a program from VPRO public television. Check out my playlists for more documentaries. "

thank you!

I intend to watch after work today. 

I care for jews, but I also care for muslims. I can't imagine living in either Israel or Palestine (what there is of it) with the constant tension and revenge. I am very angry with the aipac/zionist lobby..the money, the war, the deception, 9/11... 

whaterver AIPAC wants, AIPAC gets

 Democratic Defectors and the Israel Lobby

http://www.counterpunch.org/kroth07102007.html

Mike Gravel must realize something has to be done about this cabal. My nephew risked his life in the marines - two tours in the ME - because of them and the oil people. He has lost 6 fellow marine friends! for oil and for israel! for what! American jews need to get on the justice page where this is concerned.

They're there

They're there, Kate. There have been dramatic protests against the AIPAC mob in Boston. There are 1680 refuseniks in Israel itself. But Cecilie Surasky notes the muzzle applied to anyone, but to Jews especially, who criticize the AIPAC, the Israeli far-right wing, and the Neocons in Washington DC and in Israel.

The standard anti-Semite label applied to those of us who point out that it is in the interests of neither the Israeli or American peoples for the illegal occupation of Palestine to continue is really a rallying cry to insiders, to Jews themselves, with the added side effect of silencing some criticism of Zionist expropriation and atrocities.

The Neocon tack of "uniting" Americans against "Islamo fascists" or "Islamic fundamentalists', its cry of "they hate us for our freedoms", is a page taken right out of the Zionist playbook.

Unite the "faithful" by telling them that all the world hates them, not for what they DO, but for what they ARE. This is the basis of racism, of discrimination of any kind that allows one group to de-humanize and thus to slaughter with moral impunity its selected enemy.

The struggle against racism and its Neocon proponents on both the American and Israeli fronts is real. These folks are like vampires, they never die a natural death. Look at the convicted felon Elliot Abrams, who ran the death squads in Central America twenty years ago, now running the death squads in the Middle East again today.

It is up to all of us, Jews and gentiles alike, to drive the stake through the heart of this racism once and for all. If it is not completely expunged, and very carefully monitored, it will rise up again and again.

To this our answer must be as one : "Never again!".

100% and 110%

John of all faith: how do you come off saying things like that? where is your sense of justice? the lands that are now  israel may have been occupied or inhabited by jews thousands of years ago, but not all jews descended from those people. The ashkenazi are from another area alltogether. Palestinian arabs have every right to habitate these lands freely as they have for thousands of years.  this aregument is ridiculous. Israel was one big mistake. the compromise = 67 borders. I lived in beirut in the early 60's when Jersulalem was divided. there was peace. Jerusalem belongs to the 3 Abrahamic faiths, not just to jews. do the palestinians have a 100% right to a homeland where their ancestors are buried and their towns, now demolished, gardens and olive trees once fluorished?

jews should have been allowed to immigrate into all other countries, whether in the Middle east or america during the tough times in germany. but the zionist agitated and manipulated to force them only to palestine...the truth is coming out.

Land Always Belongs to Those Who Hold It

Basic  Politics  101 :   Land belongs to those who  can hold it.

You might be pleased to study the history of  William the Conqueror ,

and those  who  inherited  what he got.

Of  course  ,  Mike  has the faculty of  moral judgment  .  With that  ,

Mike's position would be  :  it is only right to go to war to defend

what you   **have***  -- not  to get what you

don't have.

Me  :  I'm like  Mike  ;  I don't  have  much of this world's goods  !

Looks like Mike's campaign is attracting  mostly the impoverished  !

Well ,   I don't see that  I have to be impoverished of   ***mind***  ! !

Ro  W  t h  E  G  ra  V  e  L  !

  

 tannhauser PACOM  ,  tanaiste

Long Live Israel

In my opinion it is vital that the United States maintain absolute support of Israel. Any candidate that does not support Israel's right to the Land and their right to exist will not be getting my vote.

Israel does not practice apartheid and I am appalled and sorely disappointed by Carter's views. Israel has a 100% right to their land and a 110% right to defend themselves.

I've been checking out info on Mike Gravel and thus far I am very impressed. After tonight's debate I've decided 98% to actively support his bid. I'm looking for his stance on this issue but I believe I will be an avid supporter of his run for the White House.

It would be wonderful to vote FOR someone for a change!

"Democracy is not a state in which people act like sheep" -- Gandhiji

Oh I see

So because Mr Carter told you the truth you don't like him.  I'm glad you are a supporter of his no matter his views.  I did however see him asked the question about lobbyist groups and he said he wouldn't be aligned with any of them and that includes AIPAC.  I think Mr Gravel would do what should be done and that's to be fair to all people which is more than what I can say for AIPAC.

Carter

Actually, I'm no longer a supporter of Carter because of these views. He didn't tell the truth in his hit piece. The book is slanted and contains numerous inaccuracies as has been demonstrated in the media many times now. He has acknowledged a few of these but refuses to correct them in the reprints.

His use of the world "apartheid" shows his lack of concern for accuracy and balance. The situation that existed in South Africa was completely different than that existing in Israel today. To apply this word to Israel's policies of self defense is offensive, inaccurate and is harming Israel in untold ways. It gives a green light to antisemites and encourages the Left, people who traditionally defend the rights of the weak, to lend their support to antisemitic policies and the future genocide of over seven million Jews should Israel fall before its Arab enemies.

From what I've found thus far I don't think I can support Gravel due to this single issue. I just watched his discussion on the Pentagon Papers on Democracy Now and was reminded yet again of why I so admire him and think he'd make a great president. He is the only Democratic candidate I could see voting for... I've never voted Republican... but I can not vote for anyone who would cut vital funding for Israel and it appears Gravel would.

There's another post on this thread that I haven't read yet, an article on this topic, that I intend to read next, however unless Gravel will commit himself to the defense and funding of Israel I can't vote for him.

"Democracy is not a state in which people act like sheep" -- Gandhiji

funding based on justice and balance

I believe the U.S. should withdraw all funding to nations who do not abide by international laws for human rights. if they abide, if they make peace, if they show good behavior, then reward them with assistance.

it is so unbalanced - the money and military support we give to Israel!! 

I believe that Mike agrees with you

I believe that Mike agrees with you and wishes the state of Israel a long, peaceful and prosperous life within its 1967 borders, as stipulated by UN resolution.

As well Mike wishes the state of Palestine a long, peaceful and prosperous life in the West Bank and Gaza strip, after Israel's withdrawal from those territories, mistakenly occupied these past 40 years.

I think that Mike agrees that a valuable incentive to Israel to end its occupation would be for the American government to stop financing it.

Thanks JFL

Thanks JFL, I do hope you are mistaken however. Those lands were occupied because five Arab nations sought to destroy Israel. Israel needs these buffer zones. I don't believe they will ever voluntarily surrender East Jerusalem.Any suggestion on where I might read what Mr. Gravel says on this issue?

Thanks again

"Democracy is not a state in which people act like sheep" -- Gandhiji

And Israel does the same thing

Israel kicks out Palestine people out of their homes.  How can you justify that?  They want a pure Jewish state.  Nobody else is allowed to live there according to them.  That's disgusting and the things they're doing to the Palestine people is appaling.

President Truman set up the Jewish State of Israel

Watch  Bush's words on this issue  :  he always  says  " the Jewish State of Israel."

That  is true enough.

Israel is one of the  dependent states of the  U S  country .

It  is past time  for this dog to be not overly

wagged by  one of its tails .

Ro  W  th  E  G  ra  V  e L  !

  

 tannhauser PACOM  ,  tanaiste

No they don't

Israel has bent over backwards repeatedly trying to live in peace with its Arab neighbors.

Israel has been a legal nation, recognized by the UK, the EU, the UN, the US, Egypt, and many other nations since 1948. Palestinians, most of whom were not born in 1948, constantly attack Israel with suicide bombers, with scuds, etc.

Imagine how the US would respond if Nevada began attacking California! We went through this basic scenario with our Civil War, still the bloodiest in US history. The US crushes people it deems as terrorists, be that the innocent victims at Waco, the Old South, Wounded Knee etc. The government of Israel must decide how to protect its citizens from these attacks. It is their decision.

Many of the issues I assume you are referencing have to do with the demolition of private homes along the wall. The reason the wall is being built is because of these Palestinian and other Arab attacks on Israel. When the legal government of Israel tells people living in Israel that their property is being taken for a civic project like this and they refuse, the government will move these people. We see the same thing in the US all the time when the government forces people to sell their homes to build shopping centers and highways, except that Americans don't usually kill the construction workers!

Israel, whether one likes the wall idea of not, is trying to make their nation safer for their citizens. This is Israel's legal right as the duly recognized governments. Those told to leave their homes for such projects can either leave or go to court and fight the order. When people refuse to leave or pursue legal options, they are moved forcibly. The US does the same thing. Again, the difference is that we don't usually take up weapons to resist the court orders. The Israeli government has the right to control Israel. 

There are abuses going on on all sides of course and these will continue to happen until and unless the Arabs stop murdering Israeli citizens. Without US support the Arab nations would roll into Israel and the world would witness one of the worst cases of genocide in history, unless Messiah comes and this possibility isn't something we should base our foreign policy on.

"Democracy is not a state in which people act like sheep" -- Gandhiji