I totally learned this from Obama. So all credits go to this genius.
First write a book with a splashing title such as Audacity of Hope 2.0 and set my foot in the ground of the people. In the book, I will make it clear to the corporate America that I will not challenge their status quo, and I will stick to the middle ground. So the agents for the corporate there seeking for the next president hopeful to invest their money in will notice me and start investing money in me.
Then before I run for a national position, I will make some kind of bold statements such as anti-war, so later I can accuse other competitors for their compromise. They will just have to accept my accusation. They won't reveal that they are making decisions under pressure of corporate America and that I wasn't under pressure then since I wasn't in any national office yet. How can they admit they are under pressure of the corporate America? That is like telling American people the whole representative democracy is just a lie.
Then I just need to practice to be a eloquent speaker. The content doesn't matter. As long as I can talk eloquently of religion or the people and not threaten corporate America, the current system will work for me.
Oh, I am not born in US and I cannot even speak English properly. It seems there is no hope for me. But many of you out there should really learn this lesson from this genius and consider running for the next president. Start preparing today!
Note: I might be wrong in my judgment. I cannot have all the information about a person and affairs far away from my persona life. I only trained myself very hard in my home country to know how not to be deceived. I present this case for your judgment. How do you judge Obama's integrity? Was he playing some dirty trick on American people?
See this: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080428_hope_for_corporate_america/
Comments
Now - I know how to become your next president too ...
Submitted on November 23rd, 2008 by arpidoodleIf corporations can control so much of our society they must represent a great deal of our society. To the point - they represent jobs, jobs that supposedly keep the wolf from the door, jobs that allow us to believe we have a future, jobs that keep the economy's wheels turning. Jobs that keep profit returning to investors. Or did at one point. But now the jobs that kept us under their control are leaving and only the profits from that out-sourced work returns - into the hands of a very few people - the people are beginning to wonder, and despise - those who run corporate America. A take-over of free American in slow motion happening when companies like GM outsource all their production (as they are starting to do ) How much longer will we still quietly and deparately hope this isn't happening?
Yes, Obama played to both sides of the fence with his campaign - sweet meaningless rhetoric to the masses coupled with a word to the wise (sic: corporate america) via the occassional Senate vote to ensure them their objectives would be safeguarded. There's a small handful of people speaking out against this - perhaps a larger group observing it all, but as for the future in relation to all this - my query is - can the corporations continue to rob the people of literally everything they have AND keep power - and as ridiculous as it seems - what are they going to do when everything is gone? When there's nothing left to steal?
Perhaps the answer to that is to take a look at FEMA and Halibuton, with over 60 'disaster relief centers' built in the States - thousands of shackle equipped rail cars built and over 100,000 on order - does that give anyone an idea of what their 'grand plan' entails for the average American?
Ridiculous?
It's happening in slo-mo - the Bushes have openly advocated for new world order and Obama is their man. And they have something we don't - time and money. It took them generations to take control of finance via the Federal Reserve, but they persevered, and they will continue to persevere. Who are these puppet masters? Great pains have been taken to keep their identities secret, - national security act, aggressive police action against the citizenry ... but all in all, the people who are robbing the world don't care, they want it all. They are like the pharoahs of old, this time, the whole world would be enslaved to their royal burial tomb construction. It can't be argued, it's the way it is. The hoi polloi are too oppressed and scattered to see above it, and the neocons are too hedonistic to want to see above it, let alone DO anything about it.
What keeps all parties in it is money - be it at very different levels. It is the common denominator. It's a sad statement about life in general, but it's making itself heard.
Obama's swing to fossil fuel alternates is a joke - i.e. - his 'green power' concept - a repackaging and remarketing of atomic energy that has been around for 50 years is certainly nothing new, and it certainly won't change the economic face of America - but it is an extremely salient item in the whole socio-political scene.
Power, money and supply and demand are inseparable, a practical nuclear energy program would not enable the profiteering commensurate with the current ideology that governs capitalism - in other words, it is not the function of the corporation to lose money.
The major shortcoming of capitalism appears when supply wanes, when a massive restructure has to occur capital from profit driven venture will not be forthcoming because it is not the function of the corporation to lose money - period. Now there are other countries (sic - China - India) to turn to for profit so the investors don't mind, but that doesn't leave 'us' with much.
Nuclear power is not a feasible alternative to fossil fuel in capitalist terms for many reasons, even with the most generous latitude for idealism its' implementation presents many obstacles inconsistent with current lifestyles ... no, all we can take away from the table at this point is the realization that the masses that were needed to keep the fossil fuel driven economy running are no longer needed. The factory workers, road builders and insurance salesmen are all but gone and will soon be forgotten. This is because of (and I don't want to sound redundant, but - ) it is because of profit driven capitalism. Because of Corporate America, which is neither corporate nor American. It is an entity unto itself.
When we thought there was an inexhaustible supply of energy and goods the lion and lamb lived in peace, (but) when the shortages appear the lion puts the crunch on the lamb - that's the way it is ...
NI4D anyone?
PvP
Submitted on November 23rd, 2008 by arpidoodleyou've gone and taken ACTION on an idea that has been formulating since people first grasped at the significance of the world wide web - well done jfl. Bravo. You deserve a round of appause and then some. This is what has been missing from the web - including most ngo's (non-government organizations) half hearted contributions. I will post/forward your site to the ngo's i have contacted over the past few years with my various concerns- and thanks for the citations given my last post re: airport security. ( I can not manage multi format data transfer very easily to this site as with the graphics in that article's title - due to editing limitations and page expiration (?) here. So I hack and slash a bit from time to time)
My concept of a PVP is not limited to one country, although it could be based, even focused in one country. I will forward your creation - hope something comes out of it.
Had visitors from Mud Falls, Idaho, today, two of them, it was a balanced party - one from each street in that town :) What a great opportunity to pull out the ol' Gravel for President lawn sign!
Thought Clinton was going to be Secretary of State - it doesn't really matter in one sense, it'll definitely be a corporate flunky, geez - I'm still holding my breath to see when Obama will do away with the IRS as he promised early on in his campaign. Maybe the IRS he was talking about doing away with was the 'Intelligent Reform System', and not 'the other one' - ???
In 1986 I read an article form a New York state resident sent to the Belleville Intelligencer (Ontario CA) regarding Canadian attitudes towards American foreign policy. He thought 'we' complained too much about the trade deficit, and it didn't really matter 'cause America would just nuke anyone who irritated them if push came to shove - dunno if this 'gentleman' thought he was speaking as a typical New Yorker or not but what has changed in the past 20 years? Oh - the larger trade deficit is now in China's courtyard. And a few other things. But just more of the same old same old. Nothing has changed. Or nothing HAD changed. The PVP deserves very very close scrutiny.
Well done.
Super, even.