Reform Party Candidate

July 21st, 2008 by GravelFanNJ

Hi it's been a long time since I been on here.

 

I just came back from the Reform Party, and our nomination is as follows

 

President: Ted Weill

VP: Frank McEnulty

 

Well, I don't know what McEnulty will do with his state he is on as president and what else too when it comes to petitions and all, but I do know he is a good speaker and true nice guy who is easy to talk with. Weill is a tough SOB. At 82 years old if you think he won't debate, get dirty, or get into it then you are DEAD WRONG. Think of Gravel, but with a twist of business in his bones. McEnulty is young in this game.... he is smart, an excellent speaker, and well a true avg american.

 

I would like to say to all the Gravel people here and Mike Gravel give him a look. Well, there official website is not official up, but McEnulty has a website. www.frankforpresident.org

 

I will be petitioning for him NJ, and possibly a few other states to help out. I've even talked to Frank about the NI4D and he seemed truly interested in it.

 

They could possibly be on 12-15 ballots and add an additional 5-7 as a write in. I know nothing to be excited about as barr and nader will be on nearly all of them. Baldwin might hit 38 and McKinney too, but it is a start with a party looking to rebuild.

 

 

Just asking for a look to see about them.

 

 

.... and I will be posting here a lot more in future.

 

 

‹ Where does everyone get their news from? Federal Matching Funds? ›

Comments

I'm not at all enticed by

Submitted on July 21st, 2008 by chadasmith

I'm not at all enticed by the fact that Ted Weill has made numerous considerable donations to Lyndon LaRouche's campaigns.

 

 

I looked at the issues, and

Submitted on July 21st, 2008 by Hitsumei

I looked at the issues, and I admit that I'm not enthusiastic concerning McEnulty...he sounds a little bit Ron Paulish when it comes to the obsession with "it's a State issue", especially on issues like prayer in schools.

 

Theocracy must be forbidden, period. It's not a "State issue".

 

Concerning foreign policy, the answer is an egalitarian global governance of by and for the people of the world in order to solve global problems. Why do people go to such extremes as "imperialistic interventionism" and "non-interventionism"?

 

I'm working for the ni4d, and I'm voting for Kelcey Wilson.