The last few weeks have been extraordinary in ways that I could not have imagined, let alone forecasted. The American people, at least those that look past the mainstream media, seem to be rejecting the status quo and have begun to voice their opinions in a way that can’t be misinterpreted. I’m not just talking about the liberal/progressive wing of the political dynamic; I’m talking about centrist Democrats and Republicans, as well. The issues that people are bring up in forums and in articles, bring up the same issues; the war, our tax structure, the economy and the destruction of the Middle-Class, the weakening of our fundamental rights under the Constitution, special interest influence and the refusal of politicians on a Federal level to listen to their constituents.
These issues are not endemic to one particular political point of view. Conservatives as well as liberals are disgusted with the mainstream media and their refusal to focus upon those issues that are driving the political thought of many Americans. The majority of American voters want the war in Iraq ended, they want jobs that pay a decent wage, they want a free and independent press that doesn’t slant the news and most importantly, they want to be heard on the issues.
This sudden shift away from the political mainstream, in my opinion, has to do with candidates not speaking out on the core issues that Americans are concerned with. When you add to that to the inane questions and the ridiculous analysis that the networks serve up as political coverage, people that were once listening, are tuning out. The media is trying hard to spin this as “campaign fatigue” but in reality it’s not fatigue at all, its indifference. The candidates aren’t saying anything new and repeat the same mantra over and over again, and this is leading to apathy among the voters.
On the Democratic side of the spectrum, Obama and Clinton seem to be throwing mud against the wall hoping some of it will stick. Those voters that had hoped for real change are seeing politics as usual. They are watching as political machines tear into each other without regard for “collateral damage”. Those who had hoped that a Democratic candidate would bring reason to the White House are hearing of “massive retaliation” if Iran should attack Israel. They are listening to strategies that would bring missile strikes to Pakistan and Iran. They are watching the Democrats turn their backs on former President Carter as he wins big concessions from Hamas and a real hope for peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians that unfortunately will go nowhere now. These things that I have mentioned in regards to the Democrats have not fallen on deaf ears. American voters are faced with a real dilemma, either support their candidates that advocate failed policies and saber-rattling, or watch Senator McCain, who clearly has lost touch with reality, become President.
The Republicans face a dilemma of their own. They have a candidate that has changed his political views so many times in the last four years that it is virtually impossible to fully understand what, if anything, he actually stands for. He admits he is weak on knowledge of the economy, yet we are facing a huge economic crisis. McCain can’t differentiate between Al-Queda and Iran, between Sunni and Shiite nor can he understand the difference between Iraq and Vietnam. He has a rotten temper, a tumor in his cheek he refuses to acknowledge, and he wants to continue the “American Empire” experiment (with the wars that accompany this) regardless of the consequences to the economy. They also have no real alternative, unless they are willing to accept the Democrats that the media has labeled as “so liberal that they are almost socialists”.
It really doesn’t matter what party you support, none of the candidates appeal to the basic core constituency of either the GOP or the Democrats. It doesn’t take a political analyst to understand that the current presidential race is probably one of the most over-hyped in US history. The media has failed the people miserably by focusing on personalities instead of principle, rhetoric over reality and innuendo over insight. We understand less about these people running for President than we did at the beginning of this travesty. These people have changed their stances not only with each passing day, but with each group they talk to.
The situation is ripe for a third party candidate that can fuel the American voter’s imagination. I think that the political parties and the corporate controlled mainstream media have underestimated the American people. The feeling right now is one of indifference and apathy. This could well translate to righteous indignation unless the politicos and the MSM start to address the real concerns of the people that make up both parties. The stakes in this election are too high to continue the “business as usual” routine. The American people are being hurt by the failed policies of Bush and his followers. The majority of people are no longer listening, when that happens; it usually means that they are thinking for themselves. This may not bode well for the two political parties that have locked up this country for the last 150 years, but realisticly this could be best thing that could have happened for Americans.
Comments
... ignorance is bliss ...
Submitted on April 27th, 2008 by arpidoodle'The situation is ripe for a third party candidate that can fuel the American voter’s imagination. I think that the political parties and the corporate controlled mainstream media have underestimated the American people.'
Maybe instead of politics as usual, there may well come a day for 'no politics - period!'
The way 'politics as usual' handled Katrina might indicate the way future domestic crises will be handled.
The slow eradication of the middle class has been a concerted effort by, for lack of a better term, the NWO.
When the energy crunch hits hard who in their right mind will believe the folks who brought this upon them are going to do anything but turn tail and run?
In as little as 5 years there might not be much worth saving.
If third party candidates like Gravel want to face reality they have to drop the altruistic, humanitarian, nice guy approach or when the oil dries up, Katrina will look like a Sunday school picnic. If gas at $10/gal doens't screw things up beyond repair, wait til gas rationing starts.
Without energy America is another third world country.
Higher taxes on dwindling energy is stufuckingpidity.
Our population can not support itself without energy. I'd say there is no plan that could save ppl so energy dependent, but I think Mother nature has one that will work.
We're entering a 'turning point' era, that, or - we're going to try ignore it and go beyond that turning point.
That would be 'the point of no return' and that's where conventional politics is taking us.
It's CERTAINLY where Obama and Hilary are headed.
from 'grow-a-brain'
Submitted on April 28th, 2008 by arpidoodleI was recently reminded of some reading I did in college, written by a 19th century British historian, arguing that the critical technology for the early phase of the industrial revolution was - gin. The transformation from rural to urban life was so sudden, and so wrenching, that the only thing society could do to manage was to drink itself into a stupor for a generation. The stories from that era are amazing-- there were gin pushcarts working their way through the streets of London.
And it wasn't until society woke up from that collective bender that we actually started to get the institutional structures that we associate with the industrial revolution today. Things like public libraries and museums, increasingly broad education for children, elected leaders--a lot of things we like--didn't happen until having all of those people together stopped seeming like a crisis and started seeming like an asset.
It wasn't until people started thinking of this as a vast civic surplus, one they could design for rather than just dissipate, that we started to get what we think of now as an industrial society.
(the above was copied from a post on http://grow-a-brain.typepad.com/ )
Interesting analogy from an anthropological aspect with regard to the evolution of generational influence in society, as modern responsibilities do not rest solely with those who 'wear the pants' in the family anymore.
The assumption that that generation was in a stupor may be pertinent, but it is now relative to a much broader based decision making populace.
Modern issues seem to be more complex - (or glossed over, in Joan Kennedy's words) - the idea of clear mandates for the average citizen is becoming something accompanied by decidedly 'unapproachable' overtones.
The seeming inability to focus on the needs of the people as a whole can only be deemed as intentional obfuscation by the 'ruling' class.
This 'new' version of the 'old' hangover will require a prolonged and concerted effort to remove.
The so called 'illuminati' who manipulate life, liberty, and justice with media, money, and military are above socially redemptive concerns - above social redemption in the same context as those who feel they are above the law.