On Oct. 30, Presidential Candidate Mike Gravel decided to hold his own
alternate debate following an arbitrary decision to exclude him. Click Here to watch the debate on Ustream.tv
I am so impressed with everything Gravel has to say. I want to do everything to get his name out there and get people to know about the national initiative. The only thing I am not too fond of is that Gravel doesn't seem to have a strong stance on education. I am writing a book about how to fix our education system and I think that I see him make a common assumption I see from politicians about how to help our children's graduation rates. The conventional wisdom is that we need to spend more money on it, raise our standards even higher, give teachers more money, force students to be in school longer hours, force students to be in school for more days out of the year, etc. He stated that in other countries their schools add 20 or so more days to the school year. None of these suggestions are the answer. Forcing children to work 24 hours a day 365 days a year is not going to educate them better. In fact, it does exactly the opposite. Piling more tests, more work and longer hours does not do anything but fatigue the brain and inhibit students from wanting to learn. The solution is to foster every person's natural curiosity to learn and to introduce competition into the classroom. These methods have been proven to be very effective time and time again throughout the world.
I am disappointed that Gravel is not well versed in such an important issue when he is so knowledgeable in everything else. Gravel takes a pragmatic approach to every issue that works so well and I would love to see this directed toward efforts to improve our education system in this country.
Submitted on November 5th, 2007 by Dr. Kenneth J H...
Video excerpts of Mike Gravel in Philadelphia on October 30, 2007 are posted freely at http://majormediabypass.com. I'm currently writing a book about how the media have been distorting our elections since 2000 and have accumulated no small amount of first hand audio/video evidence regarding same. I drove from Southside, Virginia to attend the event in Philadelphia and it was well worth the time and effort. I'll likely have a few more excerpts posted later in the week.
For a little background, I gave up my chiropractic profession in 2000 when I realized that there were far better candidates the people could choose if they organized enough to pass on some basic information to as many others as they could. The media can be overcome. It's not something that's impossible to do especially since we have the Internet at our disposal and can actually get our own audio/video documentation of many events the media for the most part otherwise censor from us.
I'd like to ask Mike if he'd be willing to revert the tax structure to what it was like in the early 60's, before Kennedy gave the top income earners their first big break. I understand that he has another plan entirely yet I can't help but think it would take some time to get congress to approve such a plan. So, in the meantime if we reverted the taxes back to what they were, taxing the uppermost of income earners 90% on their uppermost superfluous income, same as they were taxed under Eisenhower, we'd have plenty of money to balance the budget anew. I know 90% sounds like a lot yet please always bear in mind that the wealthy make their money via two avenues primarily, Earth's resources and human labor. The only other way to make money is to rent oneself out in one way or another, and they don't have to do that.
Bush's tax cuts lowered the tax rate of the ultra-wealthy from 39.6% to 35% on their uppermost superfluous of income. So, in four plus decades, a rate that had been 90% is now 35%, one result being that in spite of 4+ decades of technological advancement more Americans are struggling economically now than then while people like Bill Gates are multi-billionaires. Did not taxpaying citizens finance computer research for decades bringing machines the size of warehouses to the size of PCs? Didn't Bill Gates simply take the baton in the home stretch so to speak? While Bill Gates gets tax breaks he doesn't need this country has some 12 million children who suffer from hunger on a daily basis. Is that a reasonable society, the richest one ever that ranked 41st in life expectancy last year, and lost out to Cuba a couple of years back in infant mortality rates? This is all basic information, yet it's not known by many here at the height of the Information Age.
If a handful or so of "elementary truths," as Noam Chomsky has called them, were passed onto others in a way they really understood, I don't think most Americans would continue to be content with voting for people who clearly don't stand for the average person and in fact in many areas support real human suffering and misery all tax paying citizens are directly financing. More people need to get a view of reality before this election or we're quite likely going to see Hillary vs. Rudy as our next president, either beginning our third decade under a two family rule or having someone who's been described as "Bush on steroids," take the baton from Bush.
We're all in this together. I hope you check out what we have posted and "...bring it to others," as Noam Chomsky requested of us in person over 5 years back. Only together will we ever get anywhere, and we're all in the same sinking ship. - Dr. Kenneth J. Hildebrandt - (Ken) - http://majormediabypass.com
Comments
2008 Presidential Election Weekly Poll
Submitted on November 6th, 2007 by votenichttp://www.votenic.com
Results Posted Tuesday Evening
Gravel on Education
Submitted on November 4th, 2007 by ShannonOBrienI am so impressed with everything Gravel has to say. I want to do everything to get his name out there and get people to know about the national initiative. The only thing I am not too fond of is that Gravel doesn't seem to have a strong stance on education. I am writing a book about how to fix our education system and I think that I see him make a common assumption I see from politicians about how to help our children's graduation rates. The conventional wisdom is that we need to spend more money on it, raise our standards even higher, give teachers more money, force students to be in school longer hours, force students to be in school for more days out of the year, etc. He stated that in other countries their schools add 20 or so more days to the school year. None of these suggestions are the answer. Forcing children to work 24 hours a day 365 days a year is not going to educate them better. In fact, it does exactly the opposite. Piling more tests, more work and longer hours does not do anything but fatigue the brain and inhibit students from wanting to learn. The solution is to foster every person's natural curiosity to learn and to introduce competition into the classroom. These methods have been proven to be very effective time and time again throughout the world.
I am disappointed that Gravel is not well versed in such an important issue when he is so knowledgeable in everything else. Gravel takes a pragmatic approach to every issue that works so well and I would love to see this directed toward efforts to improve our education system in this country.
I agree
Submitted on November 4th, 2007 by Mike and Lorihttp://www.gravel2008.us/?q=node/2573
Video Excerpts of Mike Gravel in Philadelphia
Submitted on November 5th, 2007 by Dr. Kenneth J H...Video excerpts of Mike Gravel in Philadelphia on October 30, 2007 are posted freely at http://majormediabypass.com. I'm currently writing a book about how the media have been distorting our elections since 2000 and have accumulated no small amount of first hand audio/video evidence regarding same. I drove from Southside, Virginia to attend the event in Philadelphia and it was well worth the time and effort. I'll likely have a few more excerpts posted later in the week.
For a little background, I gave up my chiropractic profession in 2000 when I realized that there were far better candidates the people could choose if they organized enough to pass on some basic information to as many others as they could. The media can be overcome. It's not something that's impossible to do especially since we have the Internet at our disposal and can actually get our own audio/video documentation of many events the media for the most part otherwise censor from us.
I'd like to ask Mike if he'd be willing to revert the tax structure to what it was like in the early 60's, before Kennedy gave the top income earners their first big break. I understand that he has another plan entirely yet I can't help but think it would take some time to get congress to approve such a plan. So, in the meantime if we reverted the taxes back to what they were, taxing the uppermost of income earners 90% on their uppermost superfluous income, same as they were taxed under Eisenhower, we'd have plenty of money to balance the budget anew. I know 90% sounds like a lot yet please always bear in mind that the wealthy make their money via two avenues primarily, Earth's resources and human labor. The only other way to make money is to rent oneself out in one way or another, and they don't have to do that.
Bush's tax cuts lowered the tax rate of the ultra-wealthy from 39.6% to 35% on their uppermost superfluous of income. So, in four plus decades, a rate that had been 90% is now 35%, one result being that in spite of 4+ decades of technological advancement more Americans are struggling economically now than then while people like Bill Gates are multi-billionaires. Did not taxpaying citizens finance computer research for decades bringing machines the size of warehouses to the size of PCs? Didn't Bill Gates simply take the baton in the home stretch so to speak? While Bill Gates gets tax breaks he doesn't need this country has some 12 million children who suffer from hunger on a daily basis. Is that a reasonable society, the richest one ever that ranked 41st in life expectancy last year, and lost out to Cuba a couple of years back in infant mortality rates? This is all basic information, yet it's not known by many here at the height of the Information Age.
If a handful or so of "elementary truths," as Noam Chomsky has called them, were passed onto others in a way they really understood, I don't think most Americans would continue to be content with voting for people who clearly don't stand for the average person and in fact in many areas support real human suffering and misery all tax paying citizens are directly financing. More people need to get a view of reality before this election or we're quite likely going to see Hillary vs. Rudy as our next president, either beginning our third decade under a two family rule or having someone who's been described as "Bush on steroids," take the baton from Bush.
We're all in this together. I hope you check out what we have posted and "...bring it to others," as Noam Chomsky requested of us in person over 5 years back. Only together will we ever get anywhere, and we're all in the same sinking ship. - Dr. Kenneth J. Hildebrandt - (Ken) - http://majormediabypass.com
When you watch this, ignore
Submitted on November 2nd, 2007 by AudaxWhen you watch this, ignore the poor audio at the beginning and then the slow motion glitch. it gets much better as the video progresses.
All i want is the truth, why is it so hard to find?