Iowa
Independent: When I watched the debate the other night, and don’t take
this the wrong way, but you seem awfully angry for a 76-year-old. Why
are you so angry?
Sen. Gravel: I’m angry because
every day you and I are talking about this thing people are dying. How
would you feel if you were over there (Iraq) getting shot at, getting
crippled, because your leaders didn’t exercise proper judgment. What
about the people who are going die between now and Christmas because we
don’t end the war? That’s a reason to get angry. That’s blood. That’s
people dying and we sit here complacently and say, “That’s far away.”
Iowa
Independent: Your campaign has a complete platform, but with the
lim-ited exposure in the debates and media, do you plan on developing a
signature is-sue, like say your position on Iraq, that we should get
out completely in 60 days?
Sen. Gravel: That would
be a major issue there’s no question about that. But the signature
issue is the empowerment of the Ameri-can people. I think we’re in the
point in history where we’re in very serious diffi-culties. Politics as
usual, electing people who are part of that process, aren’t going to be
able to cut it.
The only way we can solve the problem is to empower the people.
(Gravel
urges people to go to Web site — www.nationalinitiative.us — and
support a national initiative process. He believes there should be
direct democracy with citizens voting on more issues.)
Iowa
Independent: Isn’t there a concern that you turn our democracy into a
version of “American Idol.” In some sense, with fewer people voting at
least these people are allegedly in-formed. To have that kind of a
remote-control democracy might create an effect where you have some
peo-ple that aren’t necessarily thoughtful making deci-sions on
complicated matter now before specialized con-gressional or statehouse
panels.
Sen. Gravel: What makes you think we
have that in the Congress right now? It’s true. Most people question
the efficacy of direct democracy and the people because they don’t have
any experi-ence in this. All they know is the ills they see in
government, whether it’s slavery, whether its wonton spending.
The
studies show that in the states that have initiatives, where the people
make laws, that those states are better governed. There’s no reason why
the people can’t do a better job.
Iowa Independent: So,
for example, the Farm Bill 2007, do you think that should be determined
by direct democracy? I for one trust both of our senators, Tom Harkin
and Charles Grassley, Democrat and Republican, on agriculture. They
have years of experience, expert staff. I think they’re more capable of
making an intelligent decision about the future of agriculture in Iowa
than I am or my neighbors.
Sen. Gravel: Well I’m
not entirely sure of that. Why should not the American people become
educated on the problem of agriculture in Iowa and Nebraska, and any
other state — or California.
It’s an important part of our entire
economy. Why should you just think that because you have two senators
that they know what’s going on. What we need to do on all forms of
governance is to educate the people as to what’s going on and let them
make a decision.
You may be happy with what they do with agriculture
but how happy are you with what they do or cannot do with respect to
the military-industrial complex controlling the government lock stock
and barrel and controlling American cul-ture entirely?Go to Harkin and
others and see if they can make a change. I have not seen a change
happen in 50 years.
Iowa Independent: Moving on to
another issue, generally calls to abolish the income tax and move to a
national sales tax come from conservatives. What are you seeing that
other liberals or progressives are?
Sen. Gravel:
I see is as a solution to what is wrong with the country. We are
spending more than we earn, and we cannot go very long on that. In fact
we are going to have a fiscal gap on the order of $50 trillion to $70
trillion, and that is unsustainable. So what we have to do is change
our ways. We have to become a savings society, not a consuming society.
The
congress won’t enact that. They won’t bring that about. Politicians do
not have the courage do this. It takes discipline and the people are
prepared to discpline themselves.
Your people in Iowa, they’re
conservative farmers. They know that you can’t live on more than you
take in. They just know that. But the Congress doesn’t know that.
The
only way to reverse this is to reverse it with our tax system. Our
income tax is totally corrupt. The code stands 4 feet high.
Wealthy
people game the system. (The national sales tax which Gravel thinks
should be 20 to 25 percent) is the only way to start fresh, and have a
tax system that I know what you’re spending, I know what you’re paying,
you know what I’m paying, I know what the farmers are paying.
Iowa
Independent: The Progressive magazine reports that you think mari-juana
should be legal and available next to beer in liquor stores. Is that
true? What about cocaine and methamphetamine?
Sen.
Gravel: It sure is true. When are we are going to learn. We went
through the Depression and we realized how we created all the gangsters
and the violence. When FDR came in he wiped out Prohibition. We need to
wipe out this whole war on drugs. We spend $50 billion to $70 billion a
year. We create criminals that aren’t criminals. We destabilize foreign
countries. With respect, to marijuana, Doug, I’ll tell you what: Go get
yourself a fifth of scotch or a fifth of gin and chug-a-lug it down and
you’ll find you lose your senses a lot faster than you would smoking
some marijuana.
Independent Iowa: Yeah, I’m 37, I think
most people in my generation agree with that point on marijuana. What
about cocaine and meth?
Sen. Gravel: We need to
legalize the regulation of drugs. The drug problem is a public health
problem. It’s not a criminal problem. We make it a criminal problem
because we treat people like criminals. You take a drug addict, you
throw him in jail, you leave him there, and he learns the criminal
trade so that when he gets out you have recidivism.
Iowa
Indepdendent: Within the last week I heard you and the actor-activist
Sean Penn make very similar statements. You both said you believe
President Bush should be in jail for his manipulation of information
with regard to Iraq. Could you explain that and defend that?
Sen.
Gravel: If you had an FBI agent knock at your door today and you lie to
that agent, you commit a felony and you go to jail. If that’s the way
it is for ordinary citizens what about the president of the United
States who lies to the American people, fraudulently sells them on a
war that 50 million Americans don’t want and over 3,000 Americans get
killed as a result of that and thousands and thousands or Iraqis gets
killed do you not think that’s a felony? It’s criminal.
Iowa
Independent: You are responsible for one of the most significant
anti-war actions in American history, the release of the Pentagon
papers during the Vietnam War. Where has your anti-war voice been since
you left the Senate in 1981? I’m a close student of politics, and no
offense, but I had not heard of you until I saw you on the stage the
other night.
Sen. Gravel: I left the Senate in
1981 disgusted with government, disgusted with politics, and left and I
hid for a decade. Then I came out of it because I’m a student of
politics and I started to analyze, well, what is the solution to human
governance. That’s when I came to the conclusion: It’s very simple. The
answer is with the people, not the leaders. The leaders cannot address
the needs of the people.
Iowa Independent: Senator, do
you plan on campaigning in Iowa or are you going to hit some of the
bigger states that have moved out their dates.
Sen. Gravel: I’ve already been to Iowa. Enjoyed it.
Iowa Independent: Do you honestly think you can win the Democratic nomination?
Sen.
Gravel: Yes, I do because think Americans are fed up. I think the
people in Iowa are fed up with politics as usual. What do they see: the
same old politicians saying the same old things, dodging the same old
questions whether its drugs, whether its abortion, whether its true to
power. Listen to them in debates.
Iowa Independent:
Since you’re confident that you’ll win if I bet you $50 that you won’t
win the nomination, and gave you 20 to 1 odds, would you take it?
Comments
Registering to Vote
Submitted on May 29th, 2007 by weda562002Gravel/Hagel 08!
Submitted on May 29th, 2007 by freespeech07Check Out the National Initiative Citizen Lawmaking at :
Submitted on May 25th, 2007 by pacomwww.ni4d.us
ROW THE GRAVEL !
tannhauser PACOM , tanaiste
There is hope
Submitted on May 21st, 2007 by kigi8Kigi8
I was so glad to see Mike on CNN last night. I am one of those who, because of disgust and absolute frustration with our political process, don't watch the "debates" put on by a lame media; I didn't know Mike Gravel was running. Hell, I had never even heard the name before. I listened to what he had to say and now I am convinced that if we don't nominate him and then elect him, we are not going to get another chance to save this country.
I agree with what Mike says
Submitted on May 19th, 2007 by homerjay_sI agree with what Mike says about the drug war and how drug prohibition merely fosters organized crime. I agree with him that drug addiction needs to be dealt with as the health issue it is and not as a criminal issue.
I also agree with him that something needs to be done about the income tax. A national sales tax would be a decent short term solution, but the biggest problem with our economic system is the private control of the money supply and the way the system only allows more money into the economy through the initiation of debt while the private banks charge interest on this debt and there is never money created to account for the interest which creates a system in which the American public will always be in debt to the central reserve banks. We need to reign in Federal spending substantially and we need to designate specific taxes to raise money for specific government spending rather than giving these crooks a lump sum of taxes that they can use in any manner they choose, often times using spending to unconstitutionally influence policy/programs constitutionally delegated to the states.
I truelly fear for the future of our country if things do not change drastically and soon.
The infamous captain homerjay of the rebel forces
Direct Democracy, Yes Indeed
Submitted on May 18th, 2007 by DJ_WilkinsMike makes some key points on the process of Direct Democracy.
It's important to educate the People and then allow them to make an informed decision.
It's the same thing that the current legislators do.
When they need to be informed about something, they will bring in experts and listen to their testimonies.And so Yes, the same can work for the People.
Give us the expert testimonies of those on both sides of any important issue the People are deciding with an up or down vote (and you can even have it set up so that voters are requires to review the materials based on expert testimony and have those put together by a bipartisan committee of representatives and an independent body collaborating together before they are able to vote on the matter, so each decision is truly informed.)
We expect our Senators to educate themselves before voting for or against a piece of legislation. The same can work for the People.
In fact, it can work better, because it is harder to corrupt the overall population than it is a small number of individuals.
I've heard this "how can we allow the "average joe" make important issues when he may not really know what he needs to know about it" argument as a reason why Direct Democracy can not work time and again.
The remedy is the same for this issue being raised about an individual in the Congress not being educated on an issue.This isn't rocket science!
And if our current Legislators can't figure that out, as We the People can, that just goes to prove the point.
Let the People Decide!
-DJ
The Internet is the People's Media. And now it's Our turn to Frame the Conversation.
An American politician that actually makes sense.
Submitted on May 19th, 2007 by waffleheadNice Interview
Submitted on May 18th, 2007 by Deaniachttp://www.democracyfest.net/
President Gravel
Submitted on May 18th, 2007 by waynemagnusWayne Magnus
We the People are going to select Mike Gravel for President of the United States and I believe we should allow him to select the Vice-President, but that can be discussed
i love the increasing press...
Submitted on May 18th, 2007 by stephenI love the increasing coverage Sen Gravel is getting - I really hope we see a Kucinich / Gravel White House - a future I feel i could actually look fwd to.
If Democrats dont pick Mike then Gravel-Nader
Submitted on May 18th, 2007 by aaron.j.davisSome combination of Mike
Submitted on May 18th, 2007 by elimisteveVote Mike Gravel for President in 2008!
Mike Gravel-Ron Paul combination
Submitted on May 24th, 2007 by auntgracieauntgracie
I agree. I have been thinking I would like to see a Gravel-Paul combination. This nation is in a constitutional crisis and these guys have the guts to see it through. They're the only ones with the cahones to put the Bushies and all their friends where they belong-behind bars.
The Fair Tax and a National Initiative that gives all REAL Americans the right to make laws should stop all the special interests in their tracks.
GO MIKE!
Gravel/Feingold
Submitted on May 21st, 2007 by smash1gordon