Senator Mike Gravel (D-AK) stunned the democratic audience today with a scathing attack on what he called “politics as usual.”
The senator established himself as a force to be reckoned with in the race for the democratic nomination for president.
Gravel, who began his speech by thanking Chairman Howard Dean for his own opposition to the Iraq War during his candidacy, told a packed house; “I plan to speak truth to power today. You, the delegates, have the power to decide who will be the Democratic nominee. I also plan to speak truth to the American people, who have the power to choose the next President of the United States”
Gravel, who during his two terms in the U.S. senate, established himself as an outspoken critic of government corruption and secrecy. He officially released the “top secret” Pentagon Papers a government study that covered the initial U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War and the lies and unauthorized actions of several Administrations. Gravel, told the audience that he felt entitled to raise the issue as he spoke “truth to power” during his time in the senate.
“I officially released the Pentagon Papers, and as a result, Richard Nixon sued me all the way to the Supreme Court. I successfully filibustered to force an end to the military draft. I filibustered alone and with others to end the appropriations for the Vietnam War. Those are my credentials. I’ve been there and know how hard it is to oppose the majority of your peers.”
He then asked that other candidates be held to the same standard.
Senator Gravel, referring to President Bush as “a President consumed with messianic purpose” spent much of the speech addressing the war in Iraq.
“Given the extreme importance of any decision to go to war, and I am anguished to say this, it’s my opinion that anyone who voted for the war on October 11––based on what President Bush represented––is not qualified to hold the office of President.”
He continued:
“If we don’t bring our soldiers home now, what do we tell the families of those killed and maimed between now and some future arbitrary date? The sooner we get our military out of Iraq, the sooner we can turn to the international community to help with a diplomatic solution to bring an end to the sectarian civil war we caused.”
Senator Gravel addressed the democrat’s role in authorizing the war.
“The Democrats controlled the Senate on October 11, 2002 and provided political cover for George Bush to invade Iraq. The Senate leadership could have refused to even take up the resolution, or a few Senators who opposed it could have mounted a filibuster.”
“But the fear of opposing a popular warrior President on the eve of a mid-term election prevailed. Political calculations trumped morality, and the Middle East was set ablaze. The Democrats lost in the election anyway, but the American people lost even more. It was politics as usual.”
“Saying ‘I would not have voted for the resolution if I had known the mess it would create’––or worse, saying ‘the decision was right but Bush botched the job’––is inadequate rationale for a person who may hold the most powerful political position in the world.”
Gravel spoke of the goals of the founding fathers.
“Our Founders envisioned the People and their political leaders working together to nurture these goals and to shape these concepts from generation to generation. Unfortunately, early on, in a compromise to perpetuate the evil institution of slavery in the Constitution, the People lost their power to amend the Constitution and make laws. The compromisers knew the People would not ratify a Constitution that legalized slavery and would outlaw it if they had lawmaking powers. The results of this moral compromise brought about the primacy of representative government and its monopoly on lawmaking power.”
The senator ended with promoting his plan for direct democracy, the National Initiative.
“We, the People are the fount of all political power. We have the right to propose and to enact the National Initiative for Democracy––a legislative package that includes a constitutional amendment and a federal statute that empowers Americans as lawmakers. A majority of Americans, about 60 million, will have to vote for it in order to become the law of the land. The National Initiative does not abolish representative government, but it adds another Check to our system of Checks and Balances––We, the People.”
Comments
Honest Services Fraud
Submitted on May 1st, 2007 by GroundswellWhether or not Congress, Senators or Representatives, are providing HONEST SERVICES to constituents is a core concern. That's why the slate of Abramoff convictions, as well as recent indictments in Alaska's crony system (by the Public Integrity Section of the US Dept. of Justice) increasingly center in on "honest services mail/wire frauds".
"The term `honest services' includes the right to conscientious, loyal, faithful, disinterested, and unbiased service, to be performed free of deceit, undue influence, conflict of interest, self-enrichment, self-dealing, concealment, bribery, fraud, and corruption." [Google that and look at recent indictments like Zacheres, Wilkes etc. in Abramoff and Cunningham cases.]
Mr. Gravel emits the kind of integrity and moral fortitude that coincides with this deceit-free, not-for-sale approach to serving constituents. Any suggestion he should step aside and back some poll-leader is ludicrous. A medal of honor winner is just a guy in a foxhole until he sees clearly the real threat, doesn't quibble on his responsibility to act for all, steps up and goes beyond the call of duty and saves those dear to him - in a time of war. Gravel may be at the starting stage of tipping his helmut up to see who is noticing him [again!], but his attentions are on the business of the day.
He deserves our recognition... and is well on the way to earning a [second] medal of public service for getting beyond the drumbeat of fear, complacency, and disillusionment that the major parties have infected America with for far too long. Go get 'em Mike!
Groundswell Fisheries Movement - a fair trade advocacy, fighting Abusive Transfer Pricing (product laundering) across int'l borders -- Stephen Taufen, founder
Post by US Citizen "THE REAL TRUTH"
Submitted on April 29th, 2007 by Quickk08removed by user
Speech
Submitted on March 21st, 2007 by u135321John Tyson
I like what this man has to say! Watched him on the Bill Dobbs show..To a lot of degree he reminds me of another fellow,(ROSS PERIOT) The man had good idea's and he got my vote..Hope he will run as an independant.
I am looking foward to campaigning for him....we also need to get rid of our politions.THe fellows in congress an house no longer represent the people.. What have we done to the future generations....hope its not to late
Independents and voting in america
Submitted on April 30th, 2007 by realdemocracyThe sad fact is that not enough Americans will vote for an independent, and until we change the ways our voting system works, that probably won't change. Since I'd like to see Mike get elected, I hope he doesn't run as an independent, but rather steals the Democratic party nomination. I think he might also be able to get the endorsement of the Greens, and maybe even the Libertarians. That could be enough to put him over the top with the potential loss of the conservative wing of the Democratic Party. Regardless, it will be an uphill struggle.
"The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking." - Murray Bookchin
Crappy Labeling
Submitted on February 28th, 2007 by HoneyBeeATXWrite your paper
Submitted on February 11th, 2007 by Mainer4MikeI sent a letter to a major metropolitan paper in which I copied Mike's speech.
Here are some excerpts: Mike Gravel speech’s last weekend was the kind of blunt talk that you would expect from a person who has been there/seen it before. Daniel Ellsberg said that Gravel was the only member of the Senate with the guts to release the Pentagon Papers -- thus bringing the true story of the lies and deceptions of our government to light when our nation's finest were dying at the hand's of, what David Halberstam characterized, "The Best and the Brightest."
The fundamental question is where was the loyal opposition when Messrs. Wolfowitz, Feith, Cheney and the like were providing the "dubious, inappropriate and inconsistent" prewar intelligence prior to the Iraq invasion. My theory is that they were more concerned about their own political future (i.e., how their stance would play in their aim for the presidency) then they were in pursuing the truth.
Thousands of lives and billions of dollars later, we're "surging" to save face. I submit that the American people were sold a bill of goods -- our politicians let us down and the mainstream media gave them a free pass.
I'd be curious on your take of Mike Gravel's speech. Will the traditional media provide sufficient space for a real exchange of ideas, or will they anoint a candidate du jour further eroding the public's connection to those who would lead our country.
Mike Gravel is running because he believes that the true source of power is derived from the people.
So many tragic stories from this misbegotten war. When will we learn?
I'd be interested in seeing other letters that Gravel supporters submit!! It takes 10 minutes to craft and send off an email. How about it?
traffic
Submitted on February 10th, 2007 by mprovhey guys! isn't there a full-time blog staffer here? momentum is created from momentum. a 5 day old thread with 4 comments (including this one) won't get you very far. gravel appears to be a voice that we need in this process. many people have made remarks to me about gravel that were positive.
time to get 21st century serious???
Spread the word
Submitted on February 7th, 2007 by B AllenOnly Kucinich even comes close.
In world of conflict, victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people, not to be on the side of the executioners - Camus
Cabinet position?
Submitted on April 30th, 2007 by realdemocracyAnd perhaps Kucinich comes close enough to warrant a Cabinet position in a Gravel administration. Maybe he would take Dennis's suggestion for a Depatment of Peace and make him the first Secretary of it. Aside from that possibility, I'm curious who, if anyone, Mike might have in mind as a running mate or for any Cabinet level positions. Certainly, there aren't too many people in the upper echelons of the Democratic Party whose views even come close to his.
Hey Mike, I'm available. Give me a call.
"The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking." - Murray Bookchin
I agree
Submitted on February 6th, 2007 by jg51You sir, are a breath of Fresh Air
Submitted on February 6th, 2007 by Logman826like Germany , indeed
Submitted on May 16th, 2007 by pacomYou are over-looking the part played in Germany by the medical community.
That was where the authoritarians were coming from.
By 1900 , they had most German's dopy on prescription drugs.
Sound familiar ?
And most of it was funded by taxes.
Sound familiar ?
tannhauser PACOM , tanaiste
John, not Howard
Submitted on April 30th, 2007 by realdemocracyIt was John Dean who was White House consul to Nixon, not Howard, and it is also John Dean who has wrote a book about the Bush-Cheney cabal, called Worse than Watergate.
"The assumption that what currently exists must necessarily exist is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking." - Murray Bookchin
to B Allen: Kucinich?
Submitted on February 22nd, 2007 by VigilanteKucinich doesn't come close! Gravel is Kucinich on steroids. To read the two does not dramatize the difference. You have to see Gravel on a Webcast! I cannot emphasize enough how charismatic and articulate he is. He is the man. Senator Honesty has got to have his voice and face up in the media. He is dynamite!