MIKE GRAVEL NOT INCLUDED IN MSNBC`s POLLS-Because he was.....Get this.....Rude!!!! (LET THEM HAVE IT!!!!)

(We're not ranking Mike Gravel... This guy's not just a third-tier longshot, he might be a little, um, off. Seriously, he was downright rude. Why should anyone agree to appear on stage with him? And why should any mainstream Democratic group invite him?)

From: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815

 

MSNBCAlerts | Newsletters | RSS | HelpMake MSNBC Your Homepage | MSN Home | Hotmail | Sign In
go to  MSN.com

sponsored by 

White House 2008 rankings: The Democrats

A bi-weekly rating of the presidential candidates

MSNBC political calendar
MAY 2007
1-6National Conference of Black Mayors in Baton Rouge, La.
3MSNBC & The Politico air a GOP presidential debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif.
Newt Gingrich speaks to New York Life Insurance Co. in Pebble Beach, Calif.
3-6Log Cabin Republicans' national conference in Denver
5Rudy Giuliani delivers the commencement address at The Citadel in Charleston, S.C.
Mitt Romney gives the commencement address at Regent University in Virginia Beach, Va.
Hillary Clinton delivers the commencement address at Wilberforce University in Fairborn, Ohio
6Bill Richardson headlines a fundraiser in Portsmouth, N.H.
11Newt Gingrich speaks to the Texas Bankers Assoc. in Austin
12Donald Trump hosts a fundraiser for Rudy Giuliani in Palm Beach, Fla.
John Edwards in Bartlett, N.H.
John Edwards speaks at New England College's commencement in Henniker, N.H.
15South Carolina GOP hosts a presidential debate in Columbia
Philadelphia & Pittsburgh mayoral primaries
15-18GOP state chairs meet in Columbia, South Carolina
18Bill Clinton speaks at a South Carolina NAACP's fundraiser
19South Carolina GOP state convention & possible 2008 straw poll
George H.W. Bush & Bill Clinton speak at the University of New Hampshire
Barack Obama gives the commencement speech at Southern New Hampshire Univ.
21-22New Democrat Network's annual meeting in D.C.
22Kentucky gubernatorial primary
23-25U.S. Chamber of Commerce's small business summit in D.C.
JUNE 2007
2Iowa Democratic Party's Hall of Fame Dinner fundraiser in Cedar Rapids, Iowa
3Democratic presidential debate in New Hampshire
5Republican presidential debate in New Hampshire
18Hillary Clinton fundraises in New Jersey
18-20Campaign for America's Future conference in D.C.
19Special election for Georgia's 10th U.S. House district
22-2675th Annual Conference of Mayors in Los Angeles
28Democratic presidential forum at Howard University
27Republican presidential forum at Morgan State University
JULY 2007
7Al Gore's global warming concerts
7-12NAACP's annual convention in Detroit
AUGUST 2007
2Nashville mayoral election
7Mississippi gubernatorial primary
11Iowa GOP presidential straw poll in Ames, Iowa
31Texas GOP holds a 2008 straw poll in Fort Worth
SEPTEMBER 2007
1Texas GOP holds a 2008 straw poll in Fort Worth
11Baltimore mayoral primary
16Tom Harkin's Steak Fry in Indianola, Iowa
24Bill Clinton chairs the Little Rock Nine 50th Anniversary Gala
26-28Florida Democrats' state convention and possible straw poll
OCTOBER 2007
2Salt Lake City mayoral primary
4Memphis mayoral election
20Louisiana gubernatorial primary
21GOP presidential debate in Orlando, Florida
NOVEMBER 2007
22008 Democratic presidential candidate debate in Las Vegas
6Gubernatorial elections in Kentucky & Mississippi
Mayoral primary in Houston and mayoral elections in Philadelphia & San Francisco
MSNBC telecasts a GOP presidential debate at Iowa State Univ.
10Iowa Democratic Party's Jefferson Jackson Dinner fundraiser in Cedar Rapids, Iowa
17Louisiana gubernatorial runoff
JANUARY 2008
52008 Republican presidential debate in Johnston, Iowa
62008 Democratic presidential debate in Johnston, Iowa
14Iowa caucuses
152008 Democratic presidential candidate debate in Las Vegas
19Nevada Democratic caucuses
29South Carolina Democratic primary
FEBRUARY 2008
2South Carolina Republican primary
AUGUST 2008
25-28Democratic National Convention in Denver
SEPTEMBER 2008
1-4Republican National Convention in Minneapolis-St. Paul
NOVEMBER 2008
4Election Day
Print this
INTERACTIVE
  Rate the candidates
A look at the Republican candidates and their performance on the campaign trail
Updated: 9:45 a.m. ET April 30, 2007

WASHINGTON - After the first debate, things changed -- and stayed the same. We still have two front-runners, John Edwards is solid and Joe Biden is flourishing, relatively speaking. Forty-five more debates to go...

(We're not ranking Mike Gravel... This guy's not just a third-tier longshot, he might be a little, um, off. Seriously, he was downright rude. Why should anyone agree to appear on stage with him? And why should any mainstream Democratic group invite him?)

Note: Democrats and Republican rankings will be updated on alternating weeks. Click here for the latest Republican rankings.

Comments

Is there a poll where I can

Is there a poll where I can rate those so called mainstream polls?

I posted a blog article on

I posted a blog article on my site here: Mike Gravel Censored From MSNBC Polls. Please click "Digg this" and "Reddit" at the top to boost it's ranking on those sites, and get as many people as possible to rank Gravel #1 in their stupid poll. We will be heard!

Mike Gravel for President in 2008

...and now my two cents:

In regards to the story posted to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815, I find it despicable that a news organization such as yourselves can practice unfair screening as you and the outsourced "National Journal" have done.

As you had written:
"(We're not ranking Mike Gravel... This guy's not just a third-tier longshot, he might be a little, um, off. Seriously, he was downright rude. Why should anyone agree to appear on stage with him? And why should any mainstream Democratic group invite him?)"

What in the world gives you the power to decide for US what's worthy of being covered and what is not? As journalists, isn't it your job to tell the public what has happened without editorializing it? Remember as well: just because it's "mainstream" it doesn't mean it's right. After all, that would mean Britney Spears and N'Sync are examples of GOOD music...but I digress.

Why shouldn't any mainstream Democratic group invite him? Perhaps it's because he is running for office under the banner of the Democratic party! "Why should anyone agree to appear on stage with him?" Any of the other candidates should agree to be up on stage to demonstrate that he's wrong and his or her way of thinking is correct. The American people should be the ones deciding who's worthy of our attention, not YOU.

"These rankings are ordered by likelihood of winning the Democratic Party primary and are based on a number of factors, including organization, money, buzz and polling."

Buzz? Does that refer to how stoned you are? Oh, I get it, you mean how much of a buzz he or she has generated. I'm sure you can agree that without being given the issues at hand---in an objective manner---there won't be much of a buzz.

Why should MONEY have a factor in any of this? Does the fact that someone may have accepted money for favors to be returned at a later date make him or her a more suitable candidate? That is ludicrous! What should count is the issues at hand, NOT how large their bank account is.

Our country wouldn't be nearly as screwed up as it is right now if the media actually reported the news instead of passing off concocted idiocy as "the news."

Case in point: The war in Iraq. To learn what I'm talking about, do yourselves a favor and watch the Bill Moyers documentary "Buying the War" to learn how you screwed us over, sending us into a war killing thousands of innocent people and making people all around the world distrust us.

The mainstream media should be ashamed of themselves for the downward spiral our country has been sent into. Please do our nation (and yourselves!) a favor: Learn from the errors of your ways and become responsible journalists once again. If you need tips, research how http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_R._Murrow did it.

So long, and good luck.

 

My Response

In regards to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815

To whom it may concern,

I recently noticed you decided not to include Gravel in your listing of Democratic candidates, because you think he is rude?! I thought as journalist you are supposed to oppose censorship, not publicly practice it. You have just dismissed one of the best presidential candidates this country has had in over a decade.

You expect candidates to pussy foot around and be “politically correct”? Is it your responsibility and privilege to decide who can run for president? Maybe people are right…our media needs to stop hiring low paid puppet journalist and get some real journalism done.

By excluding Gravel in your presidential candidate listings you are only contributing to the sedated state of Americans in modern day society. For the past 20 years Americans have slowly become zombies, rarely questioning the practices of our ever increasingly corrupt and shady government. We finally get a straight shooter for a presidential candidate and MSNBC takes it upon themselves to personally ruin his campaign by making him nearly non-existent to your viewers/readers.

Congratulations on throwing all your credibility out the window. Think twice before you let some other website like National Journal contribute to your news. I know your journalist did not write this, but the fact you do not even carefully screen the material is enough for me to never return to your site or consider NBC a “credited” news source again. I’ll make a special effort to mention your horrendous actions on my increasingly popular blog sometime this week.

Here is the exchange of

Here is the exchange of e-mails I've had regarding this. Needless to say, I'm disgusted with their response and continued lack of appreciation for having substance in the debates:

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Swihart [mailto:arsst33@pitt.edu]
Sent: Wed 5/2/2007 12:46 PM
To: Ambinder, Marc; Chuck.Todd@nbcuni.com
Subject: You article frightens me!

Dear Media,
I was deeply disturbed by your article here:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815

Do you want these debates to be nothing more than beauty contests? Why should Democrats have to put up with this guy? Because he led to the end of the Vietnam War draft and published the Pentagon Papers, showing extraordinary leadership and political tactics in a climate that was perhaps even more polarizing than we have today with Iraq. The nervous laughter of the other candidates and probably yourself is proof in itself that he speaks the truth. To squash any substance from these debates is about the worst thing you could possibly advocate! What a disgrace. I hope you can understand the points I've made.

Sincerely,
Andrew Swihart
Ambinder, Marc wrote:

Andrew,

Thanks for the note.

Here's our reasoning: It was a debate; instead of exchanging ideas and pressing points, Gravel resorted to ad hominem attacks. Frankly, his message was powerful enough without them. If you were Hillary Clinton, why would you put yourself in a situation like that?

Chuck Todd and Marc Ambinder
Dear Media,
What are you referring to as an ad hominem attack? That he said "these people frighten me"? That Biden has a "certain arrogance"? To me, these are mild comments by comparison to the things the media has been saying about Gravel, that he is a kook, a drunken uncle, marginalizing his campaign more and more! In your article, was that not an ad hominem attack when you said he's, um, a "little off"? Hypocrite!

Your fellow MSNBC employees Chris Matthews and Keith Olberman had the audacity to erupt in uproarious laughter as Gravel tried to explain his tactics for ending the war! And this after he already proved himself as the only person able to do this back in Vietnam! Meanwhile, John Edwards and others have interviews with the media in which they call for Congress to "stand strong" and keep sending the same bill to the president over and over again, only to be vetoed, and the host is dead serious, giving credibility to a futile tactic and a candidate with no real solution.

You recognize the powerful message Gravel had during the debates, but seek to exclude him from the race (by not televising him), because why? He hurt another candidate's feelings? It is pitiful to me that you would sacrifice having a revolutionary candidate like Gravel taken out of the race just because he didn't have perfect "manners" during this debate, which was otherwise a snoozefest had he not brought such passion and courage to the stage and to his opponents. It makes me sick, that's all I can say, and you should be ashamed for publishing such an article as you did, and I would encourage you to issue an apology to Mike Gravel for your ad hominem attack on him!

Sincerely,
Andrew Swihart

Mike Gravel for President in 2008

Dear MSNBC/National Journal Group! Your Idiots!

Daniel Lupinski

sent to MSNBC: 
Dear MSNBC/National Journal Group,
You wrote:
(We're not ranking Mike Gravel... This guy's not just a third-tier longshot, he might be a little, um, off. Seriously, he was downright rude. Why should anyone agree to appear on stage with him? And why should any mainstream Democratic group invite him?) (We're not ranking Mike Gravel... This guy's not just a third-tier longshot, he might be a little, um, off. Seriously, he was downright rude. Why should anyone agree to appear on stage with him? And why should any mainstream Democratic group invite him?)
WAKE UP!!!?
Do you want a rude awakening or would you rather have a "Crude Awakening" watch this movie and get educated about what really happening in this world as it seems like the only politician that really knows is Senator Gravel! He's a genius! You guys are idiots like our President and most of Congress who are playing with American lives! We are going to have an oil crash sometime soon and this country is going to turn into another Post Katrina New Orleans!  If you don't watch documentaries than get James Howard Kunstler's book "The Long Emergency". Get educated!  Your childrens existence is at stake here!
WAKE UP!
Sincerely, Daniel Lupinski

Who do they think they are?

Why dose the media think they can misslead the American people? I have been dreaming of the chance to have a say on what happens in my country. The big dogs are just shakking in ther boots. They dont want us to have our rights and if Mike dosnt get elected we will slowly but shurly lose our rights.

I WANT CHANGE!!!

NOT MORE OF THE SAME!!!

MSNBC is chickenshit....

MSNBC has outsourced their election reporting to National Journal >> http://nationaljournal.com/campaigns/

These are the folks who need your feedback guidance love and mentoring on the sensible approach to help america out of the septic tank it fell into.

 

Notice MSNBC's flagship sponsor on this page is "death from above" Boeing Inc. [who only make civilian jetliners as an afterthought]

 

question: What's the difference between a "hedge fund player" and a "Bu$h fund player"

difference?

Difference between a hedge fund player and a Shrub fund player, Hedges can be trimmed and Shrubbery must be taken to the knights of nit.

On a serious note hydrogenerous, I noticed you are rather savvy with the use of youtube and video, and I am in the process of creating site on blogger for Tennessee folks and would like to link to all various video. If you are anyone would care to offer any assistance via questions I may have in doing this, please feel free to email me at tennessee.for.mikegravel@gmail.com

Thanks in advance folks

My letter to MSNBC and their 'subjective' views!!!!!!!!

To the Editor / in re. to news story msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815

letters@msnbc.com

Good Day Editor,
I'm highly disappointed of your author's inferences towards Senator Mike Gravel in his or hers rantings of the Democratic Presidential Candidates.
Since, when does mainstream media have an option to disclude a candidate from their polls simply because that candidate chose to take a stand?
Journalists, I thought, were supposed to be objective! This article and the wording contained there in seems pretty subjective to me. Journalism is also supposed to be "Fair and Balanced". This article looks like something I would expect to see on Fox News, possibly even written by Bill O'Reilly himself!
What's wrong with you? Shame on you! This is exactly what's wrong with the United States today.
Mainstream media would much rather spend their time reporting on Anna Nicole and Brittney instead of showing the faces of our fallen in an illegal and unjustified war! You need not worry, PBS airs their faces every night during their newscast with moments of silence for their sacrifice to our nation.
Mainstream media would much rather report on Iran's trying to acquire nuclear power than the Downing Street Memo or the Niger Cakewalk Forgeries instead of reporting that the bombing of Iraq actually began in August of 2002!
Mainstream media would much rather report on a president's veto for a bill passed in Congress rather than spending time on the Articles of Impeachment filed against Dick Cheney by Congressman Kucinich!
Mainstream media would much rather report that Hugo Chavez called Mr. Bush the devil instead of reporting on the 911 truth movement and all of the inconsistencies of 911! Mainstream media would much rather report on the global warming issue instead of reporting on all of the people going to jail convicted of vote fraud during the 2004 presidential elections!
Note: I call Bush, mister, because as not noted in mainstream media, he was not elected as president of the United States. He has been appointed twice, by the Supreme Court, but never elected!
Fear not, we bloggers will find the truth, and the movement grows!
What the hell is wrong with you people? Yet, you sit there and whine because the bloggers beat your so-called journalists to the real stories and have the guts to speak about it in reality, instead of editing it and making it so far from the truth that all the American people get is a watered down 30-second snippet of something that appears to be noteworthy, yet ends before it gets to the meat and bones of the story thus subjecting the American people to a form of brainwashing. This is very similar to what Goebbels did during his time in Nazi, Germany
Your downright complicity in the selling of the PNAC and NWO to the American people is  frightening! We the people are not allowing ourselves to be 'misled' any longer! Obviously, this is evident by mainstream media's loss of viewer and readership over the last few years as we get our stories from foreign and independent news. Your losses will continue to trend upwards until you decide to go back to what you once were!
Put the "G-Man's" name on the poll like any fair and objective news source would do!
Who are you to speak for the American people! Who are you to not give a candidate a fair chance! MSM's version of the news is downright disgraceful and nowhere near objective!
Respectfully
Bob A

 

=D

Lol. Good one =P

and really... assertive. =D 


http://plubius.wordpress.com wants Gravel for President!

Let the NJ know what you think of their reporting standards.

The link to the National Journal ( http://nationaljournal.com/help/feedback.htm ) is a good one.  Use it, be angry but composed, and be sure to remind them that their reporters were exactly what they accused Mike of being: downright rude.  Either that's not a bad thing, in which case they should never have excluded Mike, or it is, in which case they owe him an apology -- preferably a long, public one with an honest, not a 'quirky,' examination of his policies.

If you have a business, or are a decision-maker in one, be sure they know you won't be using their services for partnership or advertising until this is cleared up.

OneOfBillions

  I sent them a flaming letter of outrage. Damn this really gets under my skin the way these pompus fools pull this crap on this nation year in and year out. I'm starting to feel that the only people trully loyal to the America I was raised in. Are over there being killed for a lie! Angry doesn't begin to describe it.

I sent this Email to MSNBC

I sent this Email to MSNBC and a similar one to National Journal.

Subject:No Gravel Censorship

To whom it may concern,

I came across this story on your website.
The story said "(We're not ranking Mike Gravel... This guy's not just a third-tier longshot, he might be a little, um, off. Seriously, he was downright rude. Why should anyone agree to appear on stage with him? And why should any mainstream Democratic group invite him?)"
This is pure Orwellian censorship. If MSNBC actually values true journalism it should end this practice of media censorship and include Senator Gravel in the rankings.

 


Lame.

This is incredibly stupid. MSNBC is making a large error here to the American viewers. Regardless if people want to vote for someone else, Mike Gravel should get the same time and chance as anyone else!!! So what if hes straight forward. if the future candidates can't handle Gravel telling them the truth to their face, how the hell are they going to handle anything as a president? The news, media, and the cautious politically polite candidates need to grow some balls. The more Mike gets censored the more hyped I get to do everything I can to make him the next President.

I am officially pissed as

I am officially pissed as hell. I sent angry emails to both the originator of the article and msnbc

DISGUSTED!

There is not one day that I wake up and not think about the bloodshed over there.  It is not o.k.  Every time you down a beer or feed your face; think about someone being slaughtered over there.  This is a genocide.  It was wrong from the start.  As a result of this war, 2 maybe 3 times the people have died than when Saddam was in power.  Oh, but they hung Saddam!  Make no mistake, Saddam is not a good guy!  George W. said "Get them killers", "there are killers," "killers", "killers!" How does this sh*t happen over and over again like a revolving door?  It is a cycle.  War, war, stop communism, war, stop communism, war, war, stop terrorism, war, stop terrorism, war, stop terrorism!  Do you like those ism's?  ism, ism, ism; hmmmmmmmmm.  They just need a reason because it is all about control and control over the world!  I think that Mike Gravel is right about the military industrial complex.  They need a reason to go to war every so many years not only see how there new weapons are going to work that they have produced, but also to have a reason to keep up that defense budget and of course "MONEY".  Build more nukes we will never need to use because we can already blow up the world a gazillion times over, yeah, dont think about feeding hungry people or creating more jobs.  Sick!! 

This is our chance!  Our chance to stop the cycle of liars!  Stop the cycle of a One-party government!  Our chance to stop the cycle of this cycle!  Our chance to change our country to the way the people want it!  Our chance to believe in freedom!  Our chance for freedom!  It all rides on Mike!  but, he cant do it alone...we have to go way out of our way to help!  Talk to people, even if your shy!  Do something instead of watching American idol "I refuse to because it is on fox which will change when football rolls around though."  That is as far as my hypocrisy will go!  Get out, shut off the t.v., and spread the word...because this is our chance and yes, I am serious here.  Break your routine and fight for true freedom.  Yeah, I know, that was deep!

RSW

This was my letter

Sir or Madam,

As regards your May 2, 07 article entitled: "White House 2008 rankings: The Democrats; A bi-weekly rating of the presidential candidates", (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815) you're saying you refused to rank Senator Gravel because he was rude? Because he was RUDE???

The current administration illegally invades Iraq, initiating a bloodbath and when a former Senator and Presidential candidate calls a spade a spade, your spine fails to the point that you snivel that he's being rude? I also notice you OMITTED the name of the person who wrote the article.

May I suggest that you apply for work on your local high school's newspaper staff? I'm sure the demands of the journalism involved there won't overtax your whimpering constitution too much.

You make me sick. Get out of the newspaper business or stand up and think like a human being.

Mike Kowalski
Los Angeles

The more the mainstream

The more the mainstream media try to shut out Mike Gravel the more I will donate to his campaign!

evility beyond measure.

no wonder gravel is simply an "asterix" on most polls. he's not even included.

 anyways. someone should start a petition, and really, writing emails DO work.

reflect your views and let those beeples at msnbc know that gravel has the right to be taken seriously. this isn't only censorship, its unfair and biased - an illegal contribution to the other campaigns. gravel deserves to be heard, and the sooner the main(/lame)stream starts taking him seriously - the better.

 and he certainly wasn't rude.


http://plubius.wordpress.com wants Gravel for President!

Here's the email I wrote to

Here's the email I wrote to MSNBC:

 

To whom it may concern,

I was browsing your website when I came upon this story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815. I was absolutely outraged at the way the writer insulted Mike Gravel and arbitrarily decided to censor him from the rankings. This is a blatant attempt to try and limit his public exposure early on, and portray him as "unelectable", thereby killing his potential support.

Gravel's words at the debate were powerful and honest, but they were most definitely not rude. He forced the candidates to be more straightforward in their answers, which made them very uncomfortable. As the information providers of this country, that is exactly the obligation which you are neglecting to perform.

It is your journalistic duty to show a full and fair view of the political landscape, not to snuff out campaigns because you disagree with someone. Do the right thing, give Gravel the coverage he deserves.

Sincerely

Will Rogers

MSNBC

I generally don't watch much mainstream news and was unaware of the fact that MSNBC was such a ridiculous network.  Last night, I saw a speaker, Jeff Cohen.  He used to work for MSNBC and definitely had nothing good to say about them.  For example, he said that right before the Iraq war, if he wanted to have an anti-war guest he was required to have two pro war guest.  He also said that when one woman wanted to have Michael Moore appear she was told that she would have to have three people from the right to balance things.  The media in this country makes me sick; they are controlled by the corporations lining their pockets.  I just hope that enough of the rest of the country is as ready and willing to fight the fact that the major news organizations are going to try to squash Senator Gravel's chances.

DONAHUE TOO...

Phil DONAHUE said he had the same restrictions on his show- two or three conservatives for every person against the war because he tried to present the other side, and then they cancelled his show even though his ratings were okay.

Better than okay

His ratings were better than okay, his ratings were the highest on the network!

That's what was the most surprising to me

I wasn't political until the 2004 election but I do remember watching CNN talk about the whole "shock and awe" and felt a horrible feeling watching that and I just knew something was horribly wrong even if I didn't quite know what yet. Of course now I do. But that really surprised me to know that Donahue had the highest rated show on MSNBC and he was treated like that. Plus what I gathered from him from the Bill Moyers special was he wasn't really an outspoken critic but just had question's and that's why he had people on his show like Scott Ritter (God bless him for trying to help and save lives). I wish Donahue could have his show back. It's the least MSNBC owes him I think.

What I wonder with the republican debate

I wonder what they'll do with the republican debate if there is a "rude" candidate. Will they turn around and praise that person or will they do like Senator Gravel and call them kooky? I'm going with the former.

"Yond Cassius has a lean and

"Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look, He thinks too much;  such men are Dangerous."

I just sent them BOTH an email.  Here is a copy in case any of you guys want to use or use for ideas!!!!!

LET THEM HAVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!  THEY WILL NOT CONTROL the WILL of the AMERICAN PEOPLE!

To whom it may concern,
Regarding the story that YOUR ORGANIZATION CHOSE to run:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16710815
I find it appalling that you are doing America and yourself a grave injustice by clearly not including Presidential candidate and former Alaskan Senator Mike Gravel in any of your polls and trying your best to unfairly discredit and cast Mr. Gravel in an undeserved, negative light.  Did you not watch the debate?  Did you not see the most VIBRANT candidate on stage that night?  Surely your media myopia cannot be that poor.  Did you forget that there were 8 Candidates on stage that night?  What is your motivation to completely disregard Gravel?  Check your facts, Gravel has passed Kucinich and even Edwards in a lot of online polls, yet you ignore it. He is gaining more and more momentum and its VERY early. Why are you purposely ignoring Mike Gravel in all articles?  This is not fair and a is a travesty.  I hope you realize the disservice of what you are doing. This is undemocratic and is clearly IRRESPONSIBLE JOURNALISM!
Sincerely,
Adam Abeles
Youtube user name: TRUEADONIS

That's just wrong

If you notice however on the side of the list of candidates they do list Gravel there. To say he was rude is just ignorant or they didn't watch. He was angry and passionate but he's saying what so many of us have been thinking for months if not years now! So because Gravel didn't kiss the ass of the socalled front runners he's rude? This was supposed to be a debate correct? And in a debate you [i]do[/i] challenge people the last time I checked. I listened to Randi Rhodes show the next day and people called in LOVING Gravel! Screw MSNBC. They're just trying to smear him and it won't work.

Yes, please note

It is important for anyone reading this thread to note that the MSNBC poll is actually from National Journal. In addition, the National Journal itself has a ranking vote system here:

http://nationaljournal.com/racerankings/wh08/democrats/

It would be very good if you all would go there and rank Gravel as the #1 Democratic candidate. If we get him into National Journal's top 5 list, maybe the editors will rethink their assessment of Gravel's popularity.

Why are Bush and Cheney in the Republican category?

Is this poll suggesting that martial law will be declared via the Patriot Act thus foregoing presidential elections?

sosorrydubya

Censorship

People we need to fight this tooth and nail.  Call all of your democratic office's and let them know that you strongly support Gravel.  Tell everyone you know to vote for him.  What is MSNBC's excuse for not mentioning Gravel before the debates?  Why isn't Myspace including him in the Impact Channel or Youtube on Youchoose 08?  I don't want to be lumped in with left wing nut job conspiracy theorists but I'm about convinced that they don't want us to hear the truth nor have a valid solution available to us.  These media outlets make millions off of the elections & Gravel's platform signals an end to that money train.  It will also end the military industrial money train that is profited off of by the same people who now own the media.  Now they are buying the internet so that even our peer networks can be censored.  Gravel's polls shot way up the night of the debate.  They are telling us that our opinion will not matter and that we can't have it. 

 If Gravel doesn't win the Dem nomination I pray to God that he doesn't quit that he & Ron Paul do sign up on the same ticket and run indie.  America is sick and tired of politics as usual!  There is no "left" & "right"  in the main tier, there is rich and powerful.  Anyone with common sense who wants equality and fairness for everyone and a livable planet is labeled as a "left wing nut job".  I'm sick of it.  This is not fair.  This is my country, you jerks work for me!!!!!!!!!!!!  We outnumber you, we finance you and you know what YOU ARE FIRED.  No debate needed. GRAVEL '08!!!!!!!!!!!

Censoreship

The media already has in their mind their perfect candidate and that's Hillary. They would LOVE to see a Hillary/Obama smack down so to speak. Did you hear Pat Buchanan on MSNBC praising her? When Buchanan praises you than you should worry. And why do people here continue to support and promote Ron Paul? He's a republican (a lying one at that since he's really a libertarian) and if you looked at his policy's and what he wants to do with government etc. he is no friend of Mr. Gravel's policy's. I hope you watch the debate with the republicans if you support Mr. Paul so much. He's good on Iraq and the neocons but as a progressive/liberal female adult that's it with me and him. If Gravel teams up with Paul I'm sorry but I just won't vote. I'm sick of being called a nut job as well. I've been called all sorts of names because of telling the truth about Iraq and other issues from being anti-American and all the other rightwing talking points. It's pathetic and just disgusting. Who cares what the media thinks? Their job is to tell us the damn news and not to tell me who to vote for and support for president. They seriously need to get over themselves.

If you're mad as I am, write to the editors!

Feedback for the people that wrote the story: http://nationaljournal.com/help/feedback.htm
Feedback for the people that ran the story: letters@msnbc.com

I've already written e-mails to them. If enough people write, we can change the coverage and get Mike included!

Written

I just fired off my letter.

Thank you for providing the links!

written

I have also written a politely worded letter voicing my disagreement with the article and in specific the statements regarding Mike Gravel.

Given the response on the web and in blogs (as well as my own viewpoint) I think its a very inaccurate statement to make. To not include Mike because of the authors personal opinion does a great disservice to the American public. Ridiculous article and stance in my opinion.

 Keep those feeback letters going!

Letter

Watching the SC democratic party debate I was disgusted by the rude treatment of Sen. Mike Gravel by the "moderator".This intelligent and honorable man is better qualified than any of the other candidates.Your censorship of him is even more disgusting. If you have any sense of honor and journalistic responsibility you will apogize publicly and loudly. The person responsible needs to be assigned homework to learn about Mike Gravel's accomplishments- or better fired.

Screw em then

Run as Independent then? If they shut Mike out, then they (DNC) will lose my vote!  Not that they would care that much about my one vote.

RSW

DNC

This isn't the DNC doing this. This is the media out let doing this. Chairman Dean has been pretty fair to all the candidates so far. If you're this upset about the whole deal maybe we can start a media campaign to Chairman Dean and talk to him about it. He said at the beginning of everything at the DNC Winter Meeting that the DNC was not going to endorse anybody or get involved in campaigns but maybe Chairman Dean could help Mike or something. I don't know what he could do really.

No point, in my opinion to

No point, in my opinion to run as an independent. He'll get more exposure as a Dem. Although, I think the question is, what is everyone so afraid of? reading a lot of negativity lately and it disheartens me.

-Evan

From Nevada.

"Yond Cassius has a lean and

"Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look, He thinks too much;  such men are Dangerous."

 

Story on DIGG

 

http://www.digg.com/politics/Mike_Gravel_not_included_in_MSNBC_poll_because_he_was_get_this_rude

Stupid.. very stupid.

Stupid.. very stupid.

 

-Evan

From Nevada.